Blog

The Story Can Still Be Told

The Story Can Still Be Told

Don’t be mean, we don’t have to be mean, coz remember, no matter where you go, there you are,” said Buckaroo Banzai as he stood on stage with his band of as multi-faceted men. The Hong King Cavaliers. Buckaroo, the scientist, surgeon, rock star, comic book character among other things, above all else, a hero. Champion for the human race, even as two rival alien empires battle one another. Earth a weak proxy in such a struggle, the ‘ally’ aliens are not good, rather less evil and see us humans as useful, a malleable race to manipulate and threaten into helping them with their war. Despite this, Buckaroo Banzai and The Hong Kong Cavaliers are competent, poised and do good despite a strange world setting around them.

It’s still our world, 1980s America at least, peak Cold War, where the petty squabbles between human nation states are insignificant in scale to whatever the aliens are fighting over. Buckaroo understands this and heroically saves the day, without compromise to his principles. Not the aliens, not the governments, his and the Cavaliers. Buckaroo’s principles also has a tendency of aligning with the audiences. The story telling and audience align morally.

There was a time when story telling invoked morality which was understood by the reader or viewer. Compromise and pragmatism could tar a character into moral ambivalence and see them residing in a grey area. A lesser evil status. Noir and the 1970s cinema and pulp writings gave us such complicated characters, anti-heroes or simply protagonists who we could journey with as the plot takes shape. Not entirely good people. We knew this.

Whether Parker from the Richard Stark novels and subsequent books or The Man With No Name as portrayed by Eastwood in the Leone trilogy of Dollar films. Both had a code of sorts even if it the code revolved around them making money, for themselves. These characters at times do good, at least can be framed mostly in such a manner. Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver, Lolita’s Humbert Humbert or Tony Montana from Scarface, are not good men even if some men fantasy about being them. Or, in some way romance and fetishise them and their victims in a manner which is not universally moral. Revealing instead the intuition and instincts of those drawn to such aesthetics or entitlements over others.

Bales portrayal of Patrick Bateman in American Psycho, has become a meme with a serious reflection on boys and males who fixate on aesthetics and corporately entwined yuppy capitalism. The sociopath appeal and…charm? By which Bale portrays Batemen over rides the critical thinking of some in the audience. Perhaps, it’s that some viewers forget we can watch and read fiction with unreliable narrators and bad protagonists, unfortunately in an age of ‘looks-maxing’, narcissism affirmation and main player syndrome the appeal of such a character transcends any understood morality and instead validates the worse qualities in an individual.

For the anarchist brained, Snake Plissken is the anti-establishment arch type who with patched eye, occasional limp and scowl disregards authority regardless of how they captured him and convinced him into serving them. In doing so, he is able to do it his way, overcome adversity and still push his middle finger into the face of the tyrants. In the Escape universe it’s not that life is cheap, it was traded for order and authority. We don’t see the suburbia and cities away from the prison of LA and New York. They may as well be Demolition Man’s San Angeles, a utopia where facades and gentrification reduce life into insincere platitudes and meaningless slop. For those in the sewers, they are the filthy human rodents who would find themselves in the prison cities of Carpenter’s Escape movies. Not because they are violent criminals, rather they rejected authority and the homogenised tyranny of a San Angeles.

The world does not suddenly become such realisations, it deceives and fattens itself up in the mean time. With promises of stability, a law, ban and restriction here and there until choice is limited to no choices, only what is allowed or mandated. The whims of the State or in case of cyberpunk, corporate monopolies determines that people no longer have any individual agency, if they do it’s stolen in fragments or exists like a weed in the cement. Sex is safe to the point it’s a bland disconnected ritual of non-contact hygiene, music empty jigs, or put simply a vibe. Food limited slop of the corporate victor in the fast food wars, Taco Bell or Pizza Hut depending on where you watched the movie. But people are wealthy, they have comfort. Entertainment so long that’s it not challenging, degenerate or violent. Disney-adults.

The Running Man, both film incarnations, exists in a less extreme manner. The balance between grime and violence to the clean corporate and government comforts of the suburbs and apartments is less segregated or hidden. The proletariat still work and pollute the streets with the stench of their working class existence while their betters live in perfumed deceptions and technologically enriched laziness. Not quite an Elysium, where trusted old technology remains because it’s reliable and doesn’t not betray the user. Smart devices and modern technology is anti-proletariat and just another aspect of surveillance and censorship. The affluent watch the violence with deceived excitement, a breads and circus sort of dimension. The criminals and the dirty must run and try to survive those who hunt them, whether trained killers or pro-wrestling like figures of violence.

The districts and cities of the Hunger Games was more a dystopian apartheid sate, though anyone who is the victim of apartheid like conditions already consider their reality a dystopia. Unlike The Running Man this cities inhabitants enjoy a ritualistic orgy of violence where the youth kill and die for their delights. Those in the city wrap flabby and sickly bodies with fashion, morally bankrupt self interested creatures who see the world as a pantry and screen by which to gorge themselves on or watch with voyeuristic sadism. There is no empathy, no morality, no dignity, just lavish comfort for themselves and death and starvation for those beyond. All extractive societies convince themselves it’s done for a greater good.

We the viewer understand the antagonists in The Running Man, Hunger Games and Escape from New York/LA films as being evil, or bad. Even if we watch them with more in common with the audiences of their worlds, Yet, here we are in a world that aspires to live out such hubris and lack of moral dignity. A world where smart devices spy and censor, and soon can be shut down from afar. We can watch with ease, gorge ourselves on less healthy slop, while the dirty who die and starve live far away. A genocide city like Gaza may become a metropolis some day as promised in Davos, built on the bones of the dead. Among the rubble is no Snake Plissken or running men, no Mocking Jay flies above those graves and ruins. It’s a dystopia without story for the audience to care about, only exploitation and misery.

Those who do the viewing and ruling, those who are paid to kill and the societies themselves have chosen to be the anti-heroes of the most perverse kind and the antagonists. The dystopia is now viewed as a utopia. The heads of state, wealthy and the powerfully adored view the pre-pubescent and barely pubescent girls who were coerced or manipulated into sexual servitude with less affection than even Humbert Humbert had for Lolita. Yet, as they pull their silk suits down to reveal goose flesh covered bodies, each putrid thrust into innocence a celebration for liberal democracy and with every climax ending in a child’s tear another roar for Western civilisation. Government and the institutions of power made it all possible, conceals it and enabled. Those girls have no father like Bryan Mills, avenging them as he did it Taken. If there was he would be a criminal terrorist, and most of you would love the rapists and their mercenary cops for punishing him for his dignity and love of his child.

As the countless dead lay in cement powder or buried under masonry while drones and the most sophisticated weapons of tyranny and killing surround a city, or what remains, the world shrugs on. It somehow understands this is the way, it’s how it always has been. Even if some voices cry with helpless anger, the mob, those who pretend democracy is a virtue and the rule of law works beyond enriching power. Gorge themselves as those in San Angeles do or in the city of The Hunger Games. On an individual level minds wracked in drugs and profitable mental health diagnoses convince themselves they are Tyler Durden or even Patrick Bateman. None want to be Katniss Everdeen but would rather be Anastasia Steel. Debt is wealth, so long as things surround one in a castle of imposed ignorance where consequences and privilege is believed to be entitlement.

Even the morality space plays of Star Wars and Star Trek have been invaded by cynical corporate irrelevancy. Deconstruction, and gentrification, aesthetics only, no character or understanding of what made the story and world living. A New Hope? what is hope? what is heroism? What is good and evil? When the producers of such products don’t know and their audiences abandon all hope, or don’t care for it. We are left with products, costumes and logos. The Federation, despite its pretentious Utopianism was above all else a place that valued individual rights, or did it’s best to consider them. The moral narrators of the films and shows, the captains and crew, each in their own way balanced principles with pragmatism. Some doing better than others, it was often in conflict and complicated. Episodes were a philosophical debate or lesson, not merely entertainment or a thing to stare at for your brain to switch off while to. And double screening was not a consideration for the writers and show runners back when. Was Gul Dukat was right? Q certainly was.

And now as the pillars of Western hubris denigrate themselves into censorship and agents running rampant on the streets, we can witness the apology for dystopianism. The intolerance of tolerance and the unreason, a need to win, control has become the singular ideological basis. Yet, despite the jingoism and nationalism. The racial pride or religious zealotry, there is no story. No character other than hate of the other. The heroism is in bravery itself or victory. Or might. There is no regard for moral courage and what would have once, for viewers of fiction have been understood as antagonists are now revered in life. The fictions and realities merge, and both no longer even pretend to care about right and wrong, only legal and illegal, order and authority.

It’s unlikely we would see a Barry Newman character like Kowalksi or John Talbot, counter cultural and anti-authority where individuals overcome odds, and meet unique characters. The State with it’s lust for war will create numerous John Rambo’s as fond in the first book, while the government killers may think themselves a Rambo. And silently the veterans like the film, based on real life Chattahoochee and less a Tim Kennedy pulp fiction or American Sniper propaganda. There is no Megaforce coming to save the Gazans or those in the Sudan. “Deeds Not Words” have less meaning now, the deeds are dirty. The words banned or empty. No Ace Hunter remarking, “…the good guys always win, even in the eighties.” Winning according to history decides the perspective of Good and Evil. But in 2026 no one even pretends to be good. They no longer need to.

We will have no Buckaroo Banzai pointing and yelling, “Evil! Pure and simple, from the 8th dimension!” Because it exists in our dimension. The evil, is most of us. Inside, or the allowances made in accepting injustice or ratifying it. With every call for more laws, to ban, to censor and to hate with irrational viciousness leads the planet closer to the dystopia, where the antagonists rule and are all that remains. Maybe a Megacity One here, or the wastelands of Wall-e there. Perhaps that’s the story of history, fiction just let us escape knowing the truth, instead of showing us how to be good. But wouldn’t it be nice to defeat evil, and walk like Buckaroo and The Hong Kong Cavaliers into the rolling credits and beyond? The story of good can still be told, “no matter where you go, there you are.”

 

 

The Navy May Have a Use for the Haunted Zumwalt

zumwaltcps

The DDG-1000 Zumwalt-class, originally slated for 30+ hulls but only commissioning three has been haunted by failure and late delivery on everything. Now the first hull is being delivered after being retrofitting for Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) hypersonic weapons. The CPS doesn’t carry nukes. Hence the term ‘conventional‘ prompt strike. We shall see how that fares, if history is an indicator, it will take years to make it right. This is the ship that took five years after commissioning to launch its first missile out of the Vertical Launch System (VLS) tubes installed on the vessel.

CPS missiles are already hyper-expensive, niche weapons with limited value. It’s a huge waste of money to build a hyper-expensive ship to carry them thus the retrofit tot he Zumwalt. Modifying the three existing DDG-1000s is fine though, since the USN already owns them and they don’t have a real mission right now anyway. Three basically means that when something kicks off, you’ll have one that’s actually ready for action with maybe one more on deck.

Hypersonic missiles are harder to intercept and can be used to hit reinforced bunkers which even 64 Tomahawks would fumble against unless you literally daisy chain them and use BROACH warheads on each. Speed not only helps against interception where a smaller gap is already enough to slip a couple of these through but also adds a time element. It’s in the name, Conventional Prompt Strike. The missile can hit a key facility minutes after a gap has been opened in the defenses and it’d make Gulf War’s tempo look like slow motion.

Hypersonic weapons are actually adding a lot of complications into the standard air defense calculus.Their speed makes typical trajectory calculations actually fail. This could be fixed down the line but then the system needs more computational power and more expensive electronics in general. Another aspect is the defense envelopes. Air defense is often displayed as circles yet in practice it’s more complex. The further away a missile’s trajectory is from intersecting with the SAM battery, the less capable they are at intercepting it. This gets multiplied with speed. So in very dumb math, a subsonic AShM can be intercepted by an escort ship at about six times further away than against a hypersonic missile.

flight paths cbo

The CPS is not a typical hypersonic cruise missile. It is actually a ballistic missile which also has hypersonic glide capabilities (a more shallow trajectory. While it can be used to strike ships read what it’s meant to do: replace nuclear weapons with conventional strike. While that sounds sensationalist the basic idea is to have a weapon which can deliver strategic strikes against ground targets, be it something like an underground facility or just a high-priority asset in a country still having formidable air defenses.

Observers confuse the current CPS, which the Army already is deploying, which is called ‘Dark Eagle‘ with the original ‘concept’ CPS, which involved a conventionally armed Minuteman Missile. The conventional Minuteman WAS canceled because as some have pointed out, it looks and smells like a nuke. Dark Eagle is fully funded and is closer to the old Pershing Missiles from the cold war.

There is the issue of a target trying to discern if an incoming missile is a nuke or not was resolved with hypersonic munitions that creates problems of of its own. This was a big reason CPS predecessors were cancelled.

“Hey China, this isn’t a nuke” stenciled on it doesn’t work.

The warship, part of an $8 billion development programme for the Zumwalt-class, is the first of its kind to be retrofitted with the U.S. military’s Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB). Designed to travel at speeds above Mach 5, these weapons are central to the Pentagon’s Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) initiative, which seeks to deliver precise, non-nuclear strike capabilities at global distances within minutes.

The US Navy Launches Its Futuristic $8 Billion Stealth Destroyer From Port With a Weapon Designed for First Strike

 

Greg’s Adventure – A Short Story About A Dangerous Man

Greg’s Adventure – A Short Story About A Dangerous Man

Greg was irate. It had been the second time in a week he had been cut off like that. His car recovered from the swerve, the offending gaggle of cyclists barely paid him notice. He pulled into a nearby service station, checked his tyre. All seemed alright.

“Those pricks think they own the roads,” he said loud enough for a nearby man to hear.

“Yep, like a plague.”

The men agreed while others looked past their conversation including two Lycra clad bike riders who looked Greg up and down as he entered the service station. A pair of police officers were entering as he was leaving, Greg nodded and greeted them with friendly sincerity. He was fond of the hard working boys in blue. He had grown up being told to trust and respect them, his traditional values ensured he still did.

Later that night Greg sat on the couch, flipping through his phone. The social media feed gorged him with random and cultivated images and clips. A short video of cyclists cutting off a semi trailer truck caught his eye. They rode on while the truck crashed into a tree. He could not help himself, he shared the video with a comment, “these bloody cyclists think they own the roads. Enough is enough!”

Later that night Greg was about to set himself to bed. It had been a long day. In his seventies, his dear wife had passed away three years earlier. A photo of her watched over him as he smiled in it’s direction. He looked at a collection of her rare dinner plates she had restored, they belonged to her mother and were precious to his wife. Now to him.

He yawned while he flicked through the channels, fifteen stations of the same thing. His empty screen gaze was broken by heavy knocks on his front door. His heart pounded, carefully he walked to answer, robe concealing his naked torso and faded pair of underwear.

“Greg Smith? Police, can you please open your door regarding a post you made earlier this evening.”

Greg complied. Four police officers stood armed and ominously in his front porch, “can I help you?” he asked.

The senior constable, a burly man with twenty years of service held up a printed paper inside a plastic sleeve. It was Greg’s post from earlier in the night.

“At approximately seven PM this evening, someone from your account made an offensive and intimidating post, was this person you?” The senior constable asked.

Greg nodded, “yes.”

“After a responsible member of the Bike Riders Awareness Group reviewed this post, they concluded that it was hurtful and contained elements of hatred. They felt intimidated and in danger from this post. We are now placing you under arrest.”

“But I have done nothing wrong,” Greg defended.

A female officer, much shorter than the senior constable stepped closer with a hand on her sidearm, “at around two pm, while entering the Lamewank petrol station did you mutter the comments, ‘Those pricks think they own the roads’. In reference to nearby cyclists?”

As two police officers secured his hands behind his back he replied, “Um, I may have but they cut me off. They blocked my car and I had to swerve.”

“A minor traffic incident like that is hardly cause to use hateful words, you are aware of the implications of your speaking?” the female officer said.

“No, not really,” Greg frowned.

“You are under arrest for a hate crime. A review board will consider your situation. We will take you into custody for a period of up to forty-eight hours.”

“Do I get a lawyer?”

“No, due to the severe nature of your words and how much it hurt the feelings of a responsible member of the targeted community, you will not be allowed any legal council. A review officer will consider your case and severity of what you have done.”

“But, it’s a free country, don’t I have rights. I didn’t hurt anyone,” Greg pleaded as he was stuffed into the back of the lockable cell of the police panel wagon.

“The price of living in a free society is obeying it’s laws. Offensive and hateful speech is akin to terrorism.”

The police left his house unlocked for the two days he was inside their prison cells. He returned home, tired, confused and sore. He had been handed a caution and a fine, any further offences of such a nature would result in severe jail time. He found his house a mess, belongings stolen and his personal effects vandalised. He sat with sadness as he looked at his wife’s photo ripped among the pieces of shattered dinner wear. He felt a terrible sadness as he picked up her picture, then delicately placed her mothers precious dinner wear into a container.

When he filed his police report about the robbery of his home, he was told, “it’s unlikely we will locate the offenders as they are likely long gone. Perhaps in the future you may find it wise to lock up your house.”

Greg sat at his phone later that evening with a sense of dread. He was unsure what he could look at, what he was allowed to say. He deleted his social media and turned the television on, he would watch the State approved stations and hide inside of his home. He was too old to fight and but one man. He did not know what he could or could not do any more. He felt hurt, in pain and sad.

Later that week while he drove his car, a bike rider cut him off, Greg looked the other way and pretended as if it never happened. He thought what he might say, mumbling inside his own mouth, “those pricks.”

A police car drove past a moment later, “fuck you cunts too,” he whispered with a hatred he had never before felt.

The Kyle Anzalone Show: Is Trump Making Himself a Dictator? Unchecked Power And A Looming War

A president on camera says only his own morality can stop him. That single line sets the tone for a high-stakes hour where we track real-time war signals around Iran, interrogate the Greenland fantasy, and examine how power bends rules when no one close is willing to say no. We connect the dots between rhetoric, logistics, and escalating options—from sanctions and cyber operations to reports of potential strikes on non-military targets in Tehran—while reading the tea leaves of embassy closures, airspace changes, and force posture moves across the region.

We also unpack the protest landscape inside Iran: genuine economic anger, contested casualty figures, and the fog of information operations that can turn small fires into regional infernos. If the United States acts without congressional authorization or public persuasion, it won’t just risk a wider war; it will cement a template for executive overreach that future presidents will inherit. That same impulse shows up at home in the response to the ICE shooting in Minnesota, where dissent gets rebranded as disrespect and disrespect is treated like a crime. When loyalty becomes the yardstick for justice, constitutional limits become optional.

Finally, we turn to the media arena. Dave Smith’s blunt challenge to Dan Bongino raises a hard question: what happens when those who pledged to expose the “deep state” are accused of shielding it, especially on the Epstein saga? Independent platforms earn trust by pressing for receipts, not rehearsed talking points. Along the way we decode the Greenland push—why NATO already covers the threat it cites, and why chasing cartographic glory would shatter alliances without delivering strategic value.

If you care about constitutional guardrails, Middle East stability, media accountability, and honest statecraft, this one’s for you. Listen, share with a friend, and tell us where you draw the line—then hit follow so you don’t miss what comes next.

New WarNotes Episode: “The Jerboa That Squeaked: Broke and Woke NATO on the Warpath”

New WarNotes Episode: “The Jerboa That Squeaked: Broke and Woke NATO on the Warpath”

a storm over the ocean ai generative free photo

New WarNotes episode: Ep 020 “The Jerboa That Squeaked: Broke and Woke NATO on the Warpath”

The Greenland debacle is bringing the NATO relationship into better focus on just how bad the EU/SSR has become. America should take a non-interventionist pause and get its internal house in order before standing astride the world again and lighting fires that never go away and continuously make things worse.

Stop the madness.

Recent episodes on NATO.

First parts here:

Ep 009 “Fixing Fight Club: Just Say No to NATO: Part One”

Ep 016 “Fixing Fight Club: Just Say No to NATO: Part Two”

I now have a Signal Group Chat for my CG Paid Subscribers.

You’ll find the new episode right here at the Institute under the blogs.

[GUEST] Matt Wolfson: Israeli Connection to Maduro Kidnapping/ Will Zionists Get Their War With Iran?

Missed signals are costly; misplaced confidence is worse. We open by unpacking the concrete indicators that war planners watch—carrier deployments, airspace changes, and last‑minute strike deliberations—and what they tell us about the real likelihood of a U.S. hit on Iran. From there, the conversation widens to a quieter battlefield: development frameworks that trade normalization for access. Our guest, Matt Wolfson of the Libertarian Institute, explains how the Isaac Accords mirror the Abraham Accords across Latin America, offering water tech, finance, and modernization while pulling states into a specific geopolitical lane.

We trace how these packages play out on the ground—smart cities and smart villages that promise efficiency but often centralize control, displace farmers, and refit local economies around external capital. The throughline is leverage: funding and technology become tools to align foreign policy, not just build infrastructure. Tying this to current flashpoints, we connect Venezuela’s isolation and Iran’s containment to a paired strategy that narrows options for countries considering alternative blocs. Whether or not missiles fly, the architecture of influence expands through boards, grants, and MOUs.

Personalities and networks add sharp edges. Reports pointing to Marco Rubio and Stephen Miller as key drivers reflect long-standing alliances among neoconservatives, Zionist donors, and anti-communist exile circles, stretching from Iran-Contra to today. We weigh that ideological push against a president’s resource-first instincts and aversion to quagmires, a tension that explains dramatic reversals and transactional messaging. The big takeaway: sovereignty can erode by clause and contract as surely as by cruise missile. If we care about costs and consequences, we need to scrutinize the financing vehicles and “nonprofit” corridors that precede the headlines.

If this breakdown sharpened your lens, follow the show, share it with a friend who tracks foreign policy, and leave a review with the one question you want answered next. Your feedback shapes what we tackle in upcoming episodes.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest