‘Jesus, Do We Have To Explain Why We Do These Things?’

by | Jan 8, 2020

‘Jesus, Do We Have To Explain Why We Do These Things?’

by | Jan 8, 2020

“They are working for us, no?”

 

If anyone out there has any doubt of Washington’s arrogance—and the particular mendacity of the Trump administration in the wake of the drone attacks in Iraq that killed Iranian Quds force commander Qassem Soleimani— take a minute to read through Friday’s State Department briefing to reporters, here.

My colleague Daniel Larison has described the president’s behavior on Twitter yesterday, threatening attacks on 52 Iranian targets if Tehran retaliates for the assassination of its most popular general. “He cares first and foremost about not appearing ‘weak,’ and that makes him more likely to overreact to every incident,” Larison writes. “The president isn’t interested in avoiding war as much as he is interested in not being pilloried by hawks for not being ‘tough.’”

Well, the state department officials who briefed reporters Jan 3 rolled into that room with such defensiveness you would think they expected to see only Iranian faces in the room. More so, their incredulousness that reporters would want to have “details” and demand “answers” about a military strike that ultimately was coordinated in the name of each and every American, borders on sheer insolence.

Reprinted from the American Conservative.

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Our Books

Recent Articles

Recent

Abraham Accords: Less Historic Than Advertised

Abraham Accords: Less Historic Than Advertised

When President Donald Trump announced that Kazakhstan would join the Abraham Accords after a celebratory call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Kazakhstan President Kassym Jomart Tokayev, he treated the move as another triumph of personal diplomacy...

read more
NATO Is a Menace, Not a Benefit, to America

NATO Is a Menace, Not a Benefit, to America

Since its creation in 1949, NATO has been the keystone of U.S. foreign policy in Europe. Indeed, the alliance has been the most important feature of Washington’s overall strategy of global primacy. America’s political and policy elites have embraced two key...

read more
TGIF: Defending Israeli Mass Murder Isn’t Easy

TGIF: Defending Israeli Mass Murder Isn’t Easy

Although much has already been said, I can't not comment on Sarah Hurwitz, the former Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama speechwriter, who faults young people (especially young Jews) for applying their power of abstraction in thinking about the Holocaust. What do I mean...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This