For several years and in a variety of works at the Libertarian and Mises Institutes, I have argued that Washington’s bipartisan consensus about Beijing as an aggressive, revisionist challenger to U.S. global supremacy was deeply misguided. Far from seeking global hegemony, I have maintained that China’s ambitions are modest, largely defensive, and overwhelmingly focused on domestic stability and development. Now, new peer-reviewed research published in International Security under the title “What Does China Want?” provides powerful empirical backing for those claims, dismantling much of the...

For more than two decades, Washington labored to bring India closer—easing sanctions, opening high-tech trade, recognizing India as a responsible nuclear power, and embedding it in U.S.-led Indo-Pacific strategy. From President George W. Bush’s civil nuclear deal and Barack Obama’s endorsement of a United Nations Security Council seat, to the Quad revival under Donald Trump’s first term and the technology initiatives of the Joe Biden years, U.S. policy showed remarkable bipartisan continuity. The goal was clear: position India as a democratic counterweight to China. Yet, since January 2025,...

So sick of liberal hegemony, critics of Washington’s foreign policy have long been apt to seize at anything that promises something, anything, different. Hence the vigorous applause directed towards anyone who doesn’t mindlessly embrace every single one of the blob’s wars. One of the most prominent in the second Donald Trump administration is Elbridge Colby, current Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, who has drawn the predictable beltway ire for reviews of Ukraine aid and AUKUS, among other things. But here’s the problem with Elbridge Colby, and everyone else like him, from the...

Across multiple conflict zones—from the mineral-rich hills of eastern Congo to the contested temple sites on the Thailand-Cambodia border—a familiar pattern emerges: foreign intervention complicates and often worsens already volatile situations. In recent years, American diplomatic efforts, especially under the Trump administration, have produced headline-grabbing agreements while sidestepping the structural causes of conflict. Whether through strategic alignments, economic opportunism, or misguided humanitarianism, Washington’s involvement has frequently undermined peace and sovereignty. A...