Don’t be so crude. We prefer the less offensive “caring for you to death,” please.
No, seriously, they changed it to “systemic racism” so that it’s everybody’s fault and no one’s responsibility. Of course.
Don’t be so crude. We prefer the less offensive “caring for you to death,” please.
No, seriously, they changed it to “systemic racism” so that it’s everybody’s fault and no one’s responsibility. Of course.
Your town is next.
Oh well though that’s just “collateral damage” in the great drug war right folks?
Like my friend’s sister who they killed with an “experimental” new pain killer since her doctors were afraid of what the federal cops might do if they found out he was giving her what she needed.
How dare any of you people not hate government as much as I do? What the hell is wrong with you anyway?
The police are not there to protect you. The courts have ruled on this over and over again.
(Interview with Mr Lozito here)
The discussion that continues by the pundits, even “respectable” ones, fails to mention the fact that police have no mandate to protect an individual, or their property. Until that fact enters into the conversation, it is difficult to take any reform talk seriously.
Well he thought he was murdering a protester but it was actually someone with rights he was bound to respect. Oops.
Man 1.
They electro-shock tortured him to death. They didn’t even have reason to arrest him.
While Trump has repeatedly voiced his desire to bring troops home before Election Day, various defense officials and confidants on the Hill and in GOP circles have repeatedly insisted to Trump that such large-scale withdrawals would risk creating an election-year mess that would dwarf the fallout that came after President Barack Obama’s troop withdrawal from Iraq, two of the sources said.
It’s a strategy of “scaring the shit out of the president,” as one former senior Trump administration official characterized it. It plays on his fears of possibly getting tagged as “weak” like Obama was. Trumpworld and Republican hawks have used the stratagem to great success in earlier years of this administration. The tactic helped convince Trump to embrace the Afghanistan surge of summer 2017, and got him to quickly back off withdrawals from Syria in both 2018 and 2019. About 900 troops will remain in Syria, a number unchanged by the Iraq drawdown.
Which is why the headline is essentially correct: Trump’s Troop Withdrawal Is a ‘Disingenuous’ Election Year Ploy, Officials Say