Blog

All Our High-tech Weapons May Not Help Win Wars but At Least They Are Creating Jobs

Or maybe not says Nia Harris and Cassandra Simpson at Lobelog.

So where is all that additional taxpayer money actually going, if not job creation? At least part of the answer is contractor profits and soaring CEO salaries. In those six years, Lockheed’s stock price rose from $82 at the beginning of 2012 to $305 at the end of 2018, a nearly four-fold increase. In 2018, the company also reported a 9% ($590 million) rise in its profits, the best in the industry. And in those same years, the salary of its CEO increased by $1.4 million, again according to its SEC filings.

It may cost a lot to ‘defend” America but at least we can brag that we have the best weapons ever, like the F-35:

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (Lightning II) at Eglin Air Force Base in 2016. (By Michael Fitzimmons)

The F-35, by the way, is already the most expensive weapons system in history. As of March, its acquisition price tag was $400 billion. However, the cost of operating and maintaining the fleet over the next several decades stands at an estimated $1.45 trillion.

Careful readers will be surprised to learn that the operational test fleet is actually performing worse than the F-35s in the active Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy squadrons. The test fleet is made up of 23 F-35s equipped with specialized instruments to record flight and combat data for later analysis to determine the program’s overall effectiveness. According to the latest available figures, the F-35s in the active forces managed a fully mission capable rate of only 27 percent. Nothing to crow about either.

But, no problem.  Defense (haha) industry stocks are doing great.

Nevertheless, neither the slaughter of passengers nor the subsequent deluge of shocking revelations have had any long-term impact on the stock price.

JAMA: Fluoridated Water During Pregnancy Causes Lower IQs

You insane conspiracy kooks. — Uh, I mean the Journal of the American Medical Association:

An influential medical journal published a study Monday that links fluoride consumption during pregnancy with lower childhood IQs—a finding that could undermine decades of public-health messaging, fire up conspiracy theorists, and alarm mothers-to-be.

The research was expected to be so controversial that JAMA Pediatrics included an editor’s note saying the decision to publish it was not easy and that it was subjected to “additional scrutiny.”

“It is the only editor’s note I’ve ever written,” Dimitri Christakis, editor in chief of JAMA Pediatrics and a pediatrician, told The Daily Beast. “There was concern on the journal’s editorial team about how this would play out in the public eye and what the public-health implications would be.”

About three-fourths of the United States drinks fluoridated tap water—which the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared one of the 10 greatest public-health achievements of the 20th century because it dramatically reduces tooth decay.

A handful of earlier studies have suggested that prenatal fluoride exposure could affect neurodevelopment, but many experts considered those to be substandard. The new study, vetted by the premier medical publisher in the U.S., is seen as more rigorous.

“When we started in this field, we were told that fluoride is safe and effective in pregnancy,” said study co-author Christine Till of York University in Toronto. “But when we looked for the evidence to suggest that it’s safe, we didn’t find any studies done on pregnant women.”

They recruited 512 pregnant women from six Canadian cities and measured their exposure several ways: analyzing the amount of fluoride in their urine; looking at how much tap water and tea they drank; and comparing the fluoride concentration in the community drinking water.

Then, when the women’s children were 3 or 4, the researchers gave them IQ tests and crunched the numbers to see if they could find any trends.

“We saw an association between prenatal fluoride exposure and lower IQ scores in children,” study author Rivky Green said.

Specifically, they found a 1 mg per liter increase in concentration of fluoride in urine was associated with a 4.5 point decrease in IQ among boys, though not girls. Another translation: The boys of mothers with the most fluoride in the urine had IQs about 3 points lower than the boys of mothers with the least amount.

When the researchers measured fluoride exposure by examining the women’s fluid intake, they found lower IQs in both boys and girls: A 1 mg increase per day was associated with a 3.7-point  IQ deficit among both genders.

The results are significant enough to warrant a change in behavior, Green said. “What we recommend is lowering fluoride ingestion during pregnancy,” she said. 

They complain that:

It’s all but certain that anti-fluoride activists, no matter how outlandish their ideas, will seize on the new study results as proof they were right all along. The findings also pose a conundrum for health-care providers and their pregnant patients.

Perhaps the fact that the “authorities” have been wrong all along has something to do with people who disagree with them being right? Nope, the correct kooks are still kooks and they always will be. Just like everyone who opposed invading Iraq or disbelieved in Russia Russia Russia-gate:

In fact, fluoride has been a boogeyman in conspiracy circles for decades. When water fluoridation became widespread in the U.S. in the 1950s, some claimed it was a Soviet plot to physically and mentally weaken Americans. The far-right John Birch Society, among others, accused the U.S. government using fluoride to usher in socialism—a conspiracy theory famously satirized in Stanley Kubrick’s 1964 film Doctor Strangelove.

Some modern conspiracy theorists have claimed fluoridated water is a form of mind control, while others falsely link it to Adolf Hitler. Some allege a corporate conspiracy: They think the dentistry industry or food companies are fluoridating water for their own purposes.

Actually, what the kooks said all along was that it lowers intelligence. What a bunch of idiots and morons, right?

Hamid Hayat Finally Free!

Remember him? He was the 22-year-old entrapped by Robert Mueller’s FBI into … Actually, he didn’t do anything at all! All that happened was the government informant who had infiltrated his family tricked him into saying some bs about loving Osama, before the actual cops coerced the youth into ridiculously claiming that his grandfather ran an al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan, where they all practiced terrorist poll vaulting in the basement. I am not making this up. The FBI did. The L.A. Times once published the video of the “interrogation.”

They gave him 24 years. It was, how do you say, shocking but not surprising.

(They tried to imprison his father too, but his jury, to some of their credit, deadlocked.)

But now, due to the tireless work of journalists and lawyers who have stayed at it all this time, his false conviction has finally been overturned and he’s been freed from the penitentiary.

The whole town of Lodi, California was scandalized as hell over this fake sleeper cell terrorism case. They’ve had a large Pakistan population there for decades and have never had any problems. Until the worst enemies of freedom in the world, U.S. government employees, our supposed security force, came and fabricated this threat, and falsely imprisoned this innocent person for 15 years out of his one shot at existing as a human person.

Those responsible for this travesty should be forced to mop up depleted uranium dust in Iraq with microfiber washcloths for the rest of their lives. But we all know there will never, ever, ever, ever be accountability of any kind for the cops, the prosecutors, the judges, the jurors or the prison officials who conspired to violate the rights of this American — nor all the local TV and newspaper jackals who went along with pushing this obvious hoax. But they know who they are. And they must hate their own sorry guts for being such weasels and mercenaries. So at least there’s that.

Now let’s talk about the Miami 7, the New Jersey military base Pizza Plot, the JFK Airport fuel tank plan, the drone attack on the Pentagon scheme, the Portland, Oregon Christmas tree, the NY subway plot (There were a couple of these. I mean the slow kid from down at the bookstore, not the Zazi case. Zazi was a legit bad guy.), the Garland, Texas cartoon contest shooting, and on and on and on.

It took a while for W. Bush and Obama’s wars to start generating their own real blowback and backdraft attacks on the United States. So for a while, they just had to improvise by entrapping idiots into fake plots. How else were they going to scare your mom into supporting an endless regional war against a few hundred guys?

Orange Alert! They caught another terrorist! Sleepy little Lodi, California this time! We better fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here some more!

Crude but it works.

Correction: Islamic State Population Size

Thanks to John in the Reddit room for the heads up.

I said on Tom Woods’ show that the Islamic State, which controlled eastern Syria and western Iraq from June 2014-December 2017, was the size and population
of Great Britain, but that’s wrong. It was the size of the UK, but had a
population of only six million.

I thought I was paraphrasing Patrick Cockburn, but this is what he really said:

“As the attention of the world focused on Ukraine and Gaza, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (Isis) captured a third of Syria in addition to the quarter of Iraq it had seized in June. The frontiers of the new Caliphate declared by Isis on 29 June are expanding by the day and now cover an area larger than Great Britain and inhabited by at least six million people, a population larger than that of Denmark, Finland or Ireland.”

 

Is Israel Guilty of War Crimes in Lebanon?

Is Israel Guilty of War Crimes in Lebanon?

The Sabra and Shatila massacre in Lebanon was the brutal murder of many Palestinians committed by a Christian group (that Israel was allied with).  Is Israel responsible?

Some blame Ariel Sharon, Israel’s Defense Secretary at the time, because he was directly supervising the Christian group.  In addition, Israel trained, armed, fed, and funded the killers.  Others defend Israel’s actions by saying Israeli Defense Forces did not directly commit the actual crimes.  Well, how much were they involved and how much did Sharon know?  You don’t want to miss this!

Click here for the Show Notes on this Episode, which includes sources and additional information not covered.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest