Mankind is a mixture of good and evil, of cooperative and criminal tendencies. In my view, the anarchist society is one which maximizes the tendencies for the good and the cooperative, while it minimizes both the opportunity and the moral legitimacy of the evil and the criminal. If the anarchist view is correct, and the State is indeed the great legalized and socially legitimated channel for all manner of antisocial crime — theft , oppression, mass murder — on a massive scale, then surely the abolition of such an engine of crime can do nothing but favor the good in man and discourage the bad….The anarchist view holds that, given the “nature of man,” given the degree of goodness or badness at any point of time, anarchism will maximize the opportunities for good and minimize the channels for the bad.
In very few cases have these anti-interventionists favored literal “isolation”: what they have generally favored is political nonintervention in the affairs of other countries, coupled with economic and cultural internationalism in the sense of peaceful freedom of trade, investment, and interchange between the citizens of all countries. And this is the essence of the libertarian position as well.
Murray N. Rothbard, For a New Liberty, p. 330
… interventionism is not only immoral and aggressive; it doesn’t work. We must regain liberty at home, end all interventions in other countries, and return to the historic, forgotten “foreign policy” of serving as an example and a beacon-light of liberty to the rest of the suffering and strife-torn world.
Murray N. Rothbard, Libertarian Forum v. 1, p. 582
WARNING: Some clips have poor audio, I’m sorry, that is the cost of finding hidden information.
0:00 – A History of American Imperialism. Scott Horton & Keith Knight
0:57 – What is Libertarianism? – NAO (Non-Aggression Obligation)
7:29 – The Kissinger Approach to History
18:24 – Kissinger’s World Government Justification
22:00 – 9/11 Response & War in Afghanistan
28:30 – F.B.I. Terrorist Plots
43:22 – “Terrorist Plots Helped ALong by the FBI – NYTimes” and Bin Laden deal & 9/11 motive
52:50 – U.S. in Libya under Obama
57:55 – Benghazi 1:04:30 – U.S. in Syria under Obama
1:06:12 – Operation Timber Sycamore & the U.S. in Syria
Ben Swann & Obama – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceobsac7LE8
John Kerry Leaked Audio: https://youtu.be/41HhRABl3kM?t=1409
‘As President, I Don’t Bluff’ – https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/obama-to-iran-and-israel-as-president-of-the-united-states-i-dont-bluff/253875/
Joe Biden at Harvard – Key allies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25aDP7io30U
Gen. Wesley Clark – 7 Countries 5 Years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTbg11pCwOc
1:18:41 – U.S. Role in Somalia under Bush, Obama and Trump
U.S. Government to Blame for Somalia Misery https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/u-s-government-to-blame-for-somalias-misery/
“Unfortunately, sir, you have no choice,” Mattis told Trump, according to officials. “You will be a wartime president.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/can-jim-mattis-check-an-impulsive-president-and-still-retain-his-trust/2018/02/07/289297a2-0814-11e8-8777-2a059f168dd2_story.html
1:31:46 – U.S. Role in Yemen under Obama and Trump
Washington’s War in Yemen Backfires – https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/washingtons-war-yemen-backfires/
Clinton Foundation / Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Donation – https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors?category=%2410%2C000%2C001+to+%2425%2C000%2C000
Trump on U.S. / Saudi Alliance for the MIC – https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-donald-j-trump-standing-saudi-arabia/
Military Industrial Complex, President Eisenhower – https://www.npr.org/2011/01/17/132942244/ikes-warning-of-military-expansion-50-years-later
War is a Racket – Smedley Butler: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
Martha Mundy’s work on Yemen: https://sites.tufts.edu/wpf/strategies-of-the-coalition-in-the-yemen-war/
Madeleine Albright 60 Minutes – 500,000 dead children: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbIX1CP9qr4
Bin Laden Letter to the Americans: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver
1:51:20 – Waco Siege – Operation Showtime, Waco Rules of Engagement, Waco: A New Revelation
Trump v. Jeb! – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4ThZcq1oJQ
2:08:52 – Oklahoma City Bombing Cover-Up
The Ultimate Oklahoma City Bombing Archive – https://libertarianinstitute.org/okc/
2:13:08 – Most important things you learned from Jacob Hornberger, Pat Buchanan, Murray N. Rothbard, Ron Paul, and William Norman Grigg.
Every criticism of free markets, applies ten-fold to the state. The most obvious example- “we need a central government to keep order”. Five questions/points to keep in mind-
Government is the number one cause of war and jailing for victimless crimes which is the epitome of chaos
Why do those who believe monopolies are bad, advocate the state monopolizing law and order?
If we don’t have one religion we all belong to, won’t we all just kill each other fighting over which one others should follow?
Who watches the watchers? What if Brazil and South Africa have a disagreement? Should a world government be imposed to solve issues? Don’t countries today exist in a state of anarchy?
What bad thing exists in the free market that does not exist in government?
“Once admit any right of secession whatever, and there is no logical stopping-point short of the right of individual secession, which logically entails anarchism, since then individuals may secede and patronize their own defense agencies, and the State has crumbled.”
Murray N. Rothbard
Ethics of Liberty, p. 182
Secession is a crucial part of the libertarian philosophy: that every state be allowed to secede from the nation, every sub-state from the state, every neighborhood from the city, and, logically, every individual or group from the neighborhood.
A populist pro-peace movement could end the empire without even trying.
The US foreign policy establishment has inflicted unspeakable horrors on the world. And it has done a remarkable job of rationalizing these horrors or — even more effectively — directing the American public’s attention away from them.
Foreign policy horrors are
simply not an important issue for most American voters. Voters care
about issues that directly impact their own lives.
to overthrow an establishment you need a populist movement. None of the
special interests within the establishment stand to benefit from radical
changes that drastically reduce its power. Instead of reforming from
within you need to attack from without. But to accomplish that you need
the support of the masses.
So this seems to be an
impossible situation: To end the US empire you need the support of the
American public, but the American public doesn’t know enough or care
enough about the millions of lives around the world that are ruined by
Sure, you can try to educate voters, plead
with them, get them passionate about this issue, convince them that it
is the morally right thing to do. Make them care.
Or you can try to appeal to their self-interest, pointing out the enormous costs of the empire and the risk of blowback.
But the institutions that are most influential in shaping the opinions of the American public — mainstream media, universities, think tanks, popular culture — are either very much part of the foreign policy establishment, or have also mostly simply ignored its horrors.
On the other hand, there have
been successful examples of populist revolts in Western countries.
Donald Trump, for example, came from outside of the political
establishment and was widely loathed by them and their media allies. At
least initially. But Trump appealed directly to the voters, breaking
through the barriers the political and media elites put in his way.
How did he do it?
Most Americans are deeply dissatisfied with the establishment. Many loathe it. That’s what Trump tapped into.
Trump focused on the issues that voters cared about, in a way
that voters care about. Issues such as immigration, corruption,
national pride, and even wasteful wars had been ignored or made taboo by
the elites. Sure, sometimes the elites would pay lip service to these
concerns, but they were never really serious about addressing them in a
way that would satisfy voters. And voters knew it. So Trump attacked the
Not by trying to persuade them,
reasoning with them, working within the establishment. No, Trump
launched a frontal assault on that establishment. He exposed them,
ruthlessly mocked them and called them out.
liked that. Some of them truly believed Trump was on their side, others
just enjoyed the show. The establishment had never experienced anything
like Trump. All their usual defenses failed.
And so Trump won.
course, Trump was never a serious person or politician. He had no
principles to defend, other than himself. He had no organizational
apparatus behind him. And he needed constant adoration. And so, once the
Republican nominee, Trump was swiftly and comfortably absorbed by the
establishment, or at least by certain influential factions within it.
now, Trump is not much more than the populist figurehead for a
thoroughly establishmentarian class. But he did beat them, at least
initially. And that’s the lesson there. The establishment can be beat.
And if, unlike in the case of Trump, it is done by a candidate or movement that actually is
principled and that does not need the institutional, financial and
social support of the establishment, a movement that has its own ideas,
its own organization, the long term outcome may well be much better than
what we saw with Trump.
Where, though, does that leave
those of us who want to end the empire? Sure, we loathe the
establishment too, and we are more than willing to attack them head-on.
But Trump campaigned on issues voters cared about and voters don’t care
about the horrors of the empire.
The thing is: They don’t have to.
the fact that voters don’t sufficiently care about foreign policy
horrors it does not follow that they will not support a populist
movement that wants to end those horrors. It’s just that ending those
horrors will not be the primary reason for their support.
pro-peace populist movement that focuses on issues voters care about
and that are ignored or only paid lip service to by the existing
parties, and a movement that is passionately anti-establishment, and
willing and able to attack the elites head-on can succeed for those
If that same movement also happens to be pro-peace and anti-empire, then OK, good, so what?
all, we just established that voters don’t care about foreign policy.
But this works both ways: Voters don’t care enough about a pro-peace
foreign policy for that pro-peace policy to be the deciding factor in
who to support. But voters also don’t care enough about foreign policy
for the pro-peace position to be a reason not to support that movement!
situation is even better than that: It would be difficult to get voters
to support a foreign policy that requires them to make sacrifices. If
the core of that foreign policy is to actively do good in the world, by
offering aid and other such things, that will be a hard sell. You have
to convince voters to care about people far away, people they will never
meet or even see on a screen.
But a pro-peace foreign policy is not a policy that wants to start doing good. It just wants to stop doing bad.
does not require voters to make sacrifices. Voters were never
benefiting from the aggressive foreign policy of the empire anyway. It
costs voters nothing to end it.
In fact, the empire exists to exploit
those very same voters. The empire takes massive amounts of the
American public’s money and redistributes it among a wide variety of
corporate special interests: Weapons producers, big energy, consulting
companies and so on. What’s more, the empire gets tens of thousands of
Americans killed or wounded or traumatized.
the beauty: A pro-peace movement that focuses on the issues voters care
about and that is passionately anti-establishment reverses the burden
of proof: If you want to campaign on peace and ending the empire you
have to educate the voters and convince them the empire is not just
morally wrong but also bad for them.
If instead you
are pro-peace but you primarily campaign on the populist issues voters
do care about, the empire can’t compete with you on the populist issues
and now they would have to actually convince voters that it is in their
best interest to support the empire that exploits them!
that is an even more impossible situation to put the establishment in
than the situation the pro-peace movement was in when it thought it had
to make voters care about peace.
Peace, after all, was
at least beneficial to the voters. That intellectual case was easy to
make. The difficulty was in making voters care enough about it to change their votes.
But the empire doesn’t even have an intellectual case for its position. And now it also has the burden of proof.
So in short: A populist pro-peace movement can succeed. But it can only succeed by focusing on other issues that voters care about — issues the establishment actively ignores, trivializes or only pays lip service to — and by being passionately and proudly anti-establishment. The pro-peace position just comes along for the ride, and can and will be easily defended when attacked, and then implemented if we win.
What is this banging hot white chick doing in the Gaza Strip or Venezuela?
In this offensive political comedy episode, we follow the sexy journalist Abby Martin, to dive into how the Secret CIA Empire actually works. From Coups in Venezuela and Ukraine, to propaganda of the empire though the map.
Gen’rals gathered in their masses,
Just like witches at black masses
Evil minds that plot destruction,
Sorcerer of death’s construction
In the fields the bodies burning,
As the war machine keeps turning
Death and hatred to mankind,
Poisoning their brainwashed minds
Mike Maharrey joins Tommy to discuss The Defend the Guard Act that is expected to be taken up in state legislatures in the 2020 session. They touch on the appropriate use of the National Guard and why states should demand congress declare war before being granted the power to deploy National Guard troops to combat zones.
Get the suppressed truth on Bolivia’s recent Coup in a fun humor format. We roast western media outlets that deny that this is even a coup.
The United States has a long history of corrupt coups in Latin America. Is Bolivia any different? The State Department and Donald Trump think so!
Evo Morales was the president of Bolivia before the military asked him to resign. Some allege that he broke the constitution by seeking an additional term. Others claim that the United States is behind the coup. What is the real story? Tune in…
Check out our other episodes and the upcoming schedule at:
US News LA’s mayor says the city will cut power and sewer services to family homes where lockdowns are violated. [Link] Trump’s Operation Legend is expanding its deployment of federal police to St. Louis and Memphis. [Link] Foreign Policy Trump’s Envoy to Iran, Brian...
Ryan Whitacker was shot and killed by Phoenix police on May 22, 2020 after a neighbor called in a noise complaint. The neighbor didn't just call the cops and complain about the noise, he told the 911 dispatcher "It could be physical". Eric July writes: "A neighbor...
There are some subjects that must be discussed multiple times until people fully grasp them. The subject of the “double standard” when it comes to State actors and their actions is one that I think about every day. On the right of the meme is a list of actions that...
That will teach that n-word to have epilepsy! https://twitter.com/attorneycrump/status/1291207546095763457?s=21 Don't worry, thin blue line folks out there!: There is zero chance any of your beloved government-employee murderers will be held accountable for their...
One of the main arguments you hear against a massive reduction in the State (or its complete abolition) is that there are just some services the private sector can’t provide. The sophist will jump right to “who will build the roads?” The individual who has thought...
Scott interviews Tom Woods about his new eBook, which provides a libertarian perspective on some of the national questions being raised these days about the future of policing. Scott and Woods focus in on the war on drugs in particular, which has been the culprit...
Scott talks to Stephen Zunes about Susan Rice, one of the leading candidates for Joe Biden's VP pick. Rice fits Biden's criteria in that she's a black woman with political experience, but Zunes raises serious concerns about her track record. In particular, Rice turned...
Australian journalist Mark Willacy talks to Scott about his investigations into alleged war crimes by Australian special forces units in Afghanistan. Willacy has worked closely with former SAS operative Braden Chapman, the leading figure in blowing the whistle on what...
Ray McGovern joins the show to talk about Colin Powell and Mike Pompeo: two credentialed, respected members of the foreign policy establishment that have both been hugely damaging to American interests. McGovern first responds to the claim that Powell unwaveringly and...
47 Minutes Safe for Work Wally Conger is an author and Agorist who has worked in "liberty circles" since 1970. Wally used unpublished works of Samuel Edward Konkin III to put together the treatise, "Agorist Class Theory," in which he makes a devastating critique of...
108 Minutes Strong Language Curtis Yarvin is a prolific writer who used to blog under the name Mencius Moldbug. He is famous for coining the phrase and the concept of "The Cathedral" which will be explained in this episode. Pete asked Curtis to come on the show to...
55 Minutes Safe For Work Jeff Deist is the president of the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama and former chief of staff to congressman Ron Paul. Jeff was originally contacted by Pete to discuss his recommendation that people should stop using the term "libertarian"...
70 Minutes Safe For Work Tom Woods is a New York Times best-selling author and the host of The Tom Woods Show. Tom agreed to do his first ever "Ask Me Anything" for Pete's supporters. TomWoods.com Tom's Free Books Get Autonomy 19 Skills PDF Download Unloose The Goose...
On FPF #529, Will Porter returns to the show to discuss the massive explosion in Beirut. So far, over 150 people have been killed; however many more remain missing. The damage to the port will also significantly harm Lebanon's economy, doing billions in damage. Will...
On FPF #528, I discuss reports that an American company had signed an agreement with the Syrian Kurds to produce oil in Syria. The story was pushed by Secretary of State Pompeo and Senator Graham. However, the Syrian Kurds now say no agreement has been made. The Kurds...
On FPF #527, Will Porter returns to the show to explain why it doesn't matter to Boeing CEO who wins in November. Will and Kyle how the US will continue to wage wars throughout the world and spend hundreds of billions of tax dollars on unnecessary weapons and wars....
On FPF #525, I discuss Trump's decision to withdraw 12,000 troops from Germany. Washington hawks dusted off the worn-out Russiagate narrative to try to drum up fear that Trump was sacrificing the country's security to his master Putin. Trump's move is minor as the US...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFtlXIfwfQ0 ...the Austrian theory of the trade cycle reveals that only the inflationary bank credit expansion that enters the market through new business loans (or through purchase of business bonds) generates the over-investment in...
https://youtu.be/cABLDPeCY-g The belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed....
https://youtu.be/obPbgtdqTDI Businesses are always eager for consumers to buy their product or service. On the free market, the consumer is king or queen and the “providers” are always trying to make profits and gain customers by serving them well. But when government...
Tommy was joined by former Border Patrol Agent, Josh Childress. They discuss becoming a radical before circling back to Josh's days working the border. Josh talks trafficking and gives detailed accounts of specific instances that stand out in his memory. Finally, he...
Tommy is joined by Sheldon Richman, Executive Editor and Co-Founder at The Libertarian Institute. They discuss Sheldon's newest book, What Social Animals Owe To Each Other, as well as why libertarians should abandon the term Capitalism for Freed Markets....
Tommy gives his opinion on the Portland incident before diving into the differences between Fascism, Socialism, and Progressivism. Though America displays many tenets of Fascism and Socialism it is neither. But there are those actively trying to change that....
What is QAnon? Who is Q? Tommy spent this last week stuck in a Q-hole attempting to gain insight on the phenomenon that is Q. What he discovered entertained, surprised, and intrigued him. There's no way to discover every angle of Q in a week, but Tommy wanted to avoid...