Blog

Privacy and the Constitution

“[B]oth the [‘]liberals[‘] and the conservatives misunderstand privacy. The conservatives engage in a narrow and unnatural reading of the Constitution in order to avoid seeing what they do not wish to see, while the [‘]liberals[‘] find in the Constitution not penumbras but a Rorschach test that reveals only what they wish to see. In both cases it comes down to an inkblot. Both approaches allow their adherents to disparage most freedoms and exalt the few freedoms allowed by their respective moral and political philosophies.”

“Dissolving the Inkblot: Privacy as Property Right,”
Cato Policy Report, Jan-Feb 1993

Week of Action on Yemen

Week of Action on Yemen

Scott Horton and the Libertarian Party, among others, are whipping up support for a week of action to end US involvement in the Yemen War.

And you can help.

H.J. Res. 87 was introduced on May 31. The bill would “direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities in the Republic of Yemen that have not been authorized by Congress.”

The Bill defines the term “hostilities” to include “sharing intelligence for the purposes of enabling offensive coalition strikes; and providing logistical support for offensive coalition strikes, including by providing maintenance or transferring spare parts to coalition members flying warplanes engaged in anti-Houthi bombings in Yemen.”

It would also prohibit “the assignment of United States Armed Forces, including any including any civilian or military personnel of the Department of Defense, to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of the Saudi-led coalition forces in hostilities against the Houthis in Yemen or in situations in which there exists an imminent threat that such coalition forces become engaged in such hostilities, unless and until the President has obtained specific statutory authorization, in accordance with section 8(a) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)).”

It is incredibly important that every American take five minutes to pick up the phone to urge their representatives to support this Bill.

Unsure of what to say? Navigate to 1833stopwar.com and follow the on-screen prompts. Operators are standing by to connect you with your representatives.

If you have ever–ever–professed contempt for the war in Yemen, you must call.

1-833-STOP-WAR

 

Actually, Socialism IS When The Government Does Stuff

Actually, Socialism IS When The Government Does Stuff

How is something to be owned by “the community as a whole?” Ownership means that you get to decide what is done with something. If you and I disagree on who gets to eat your apple, then whatever you decide will take precedence, because it is your apple. If a “community as a whole” owns something, and two people within that community disagree on what should be done with something, who takes precedence? Whoever it is, he is the real owner of that thing, not the “community as a whole.”

– Danny Duchamp, Actually Socialism IS When the Government Does Stuff

Let’s Get ‘Defend the Guard’ on the Ballot in California!

“Resolved, That the Libertarian National Committee: Calls upon the State Legislatures to enact legislation to prohibit the States’ National Guard and any member thereof to be released from the state into active duty combat unless the U.S. Congress has declared war pursuant to Article I, § 8, Clause 15 of the U.S. Constitution”

Over Memorial Day weekend at the first meeting of the newly elected Libertarian Party National Committee, the Board unanimously adopted a resolution in support of Defend the Guard. The resolution, authored by renowned anti-war activist and delegate from Texas Scott Horton, is an important step forward for both the Libertarian Party and the anti-war movement as a whole. The Defend the Guard Act is taking the peace movement to the front lines.

In the spirit of Ron Paul, the Act combines the American anti-interventionist tradition with constitutional arguments against illegal military action, and just like Ron Paul, it has tremendous support from active duty military and veterans. Defend the Guard currently has an active effort in 31 states and has been brought to the floor of several legislatures, almost passing in West Virginia with bipartisan support, but is spreading fast across the nation.

While many states will require action from the legislature, California elections allow for any voter to submit a qualified ballot measure and San Diego Libertarian Party Chair Loren Springer is driving the effort to have an amendment to the California Constitution in front of voters in 2024. California has a longstanding culture of antiwar activism that seems to have peaked during Vietnam, with small spikes of activity during Desert Storm and into the Global War on Terror, but has been unable to achieve any victories through protests alone.

This amendment will change all of that. If the cliche “so goes California” holds true, then we could see a real impact in rolling back the military-industrial complex. Now with full support of the national Libertarian Party, the Veterans Caucus, and state and local affiliates across the country, Defend the Guard is on its way to the national conversation and beyond, marking the end of the ineffectual era of the party and providing a space for cooperation between constitutionalists, hippies, and average Americans while leading this important conversation.

The Party of Peace is now the Party of Action.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest