Blog

Why Do Americans Trust Either Trump or Harris?

Why Do Americans Trust Either Trump or Harris?

As I’m sure you all know, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has suspended his presidential campaign and endorsed Donald Trump. Among those applauding this move, the idea seems to be that perhaps Trump will appoint Kennedy to some role in his administration in which Kennedy might have a positive impact on the health of the US childhood population. But this is a leap of faith as far as I have seen. And it’s not like Trump kept his campaign promises to “drain the swamp”, etc., during his first term in office.

Meanwhile, with the Democratic establishment no longer able to pretend as though Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is a mere figment of Republicans’ imagination, given his embarrassing debate performance with Trump in June, Democrats are rallying around their party’s replacement candidate; and suddenly we are supposed to perceive Vice President Kamala Harris as an inspirational embodiment of American ideals and values, a shining beacon of wisdom and righteousness, and, weirdly, a source of “joy”.

Why “joy” was chosen as part of Harris’s public relations campaign is a mystery to me, beyond the obvious reason that “hope” and “change” had already been used by previous candidates in ways that would risk their mindless repetition being much more widely recognized as meaningless rhetoric by sensible Americans who do not have selective amnesia about the empty campaign slogans of the past.

But what is particularly informative about it is how the media have adopted the word “joy” in their coverage of Harris’s campaign and passed it off as though we were all too stupid to recognize it as a talking point of an organized propaganda campaign. (And, well, sadly, many Americans do seem incapable of catching on to how they are being manipulated by the thought-controlling news media all reading off the same script.)

As an example of the mindless slavish devotion to the political establishment, a recent New York Times opinion piece credits Harris with envisioning “a more holistic and entirely new story about how the economy works and the aims it should serve.”

So, suddenly, Kamala Harris is an expert on the economy!

Never mind how she has blamed the problem of price inflation on businesses engaging in “price gouging”, thus deflecting from its true primary cause, which was the trillions of dollars that the Federal Reserve created out of thin air in order to rob us all of our purchasing power in service to the state, by monetizing the debt incurred as a result of the government’s insane and criminal policy of deliberately shutting down the economy in response to the COVID‑19 pandemic, with the endgame of that policy from the start having been coerced mass vaccination.

Harris is economically illiterate, but here she is being characterized as some kind of visionary who is going to educate us all about how the economy really functions, and we are supposed to believe that her proposed policies are really in our own best interests. Never mind that it’s not actually very clear what those policies might be—it’s all so very vague.

The insult to any thinking person’s intelligence is just too much to bear. The most specific the Times article gets is to say she proposes “using trillions of dollars in public investment to simulate private dollars”, including with the aim of building three million new homes.

But “public investment” is just the usual code phrase for the forcible expropriation of our wealth for redistribution according to the whims of clueless politicians.

It’s the usual code for saying that Harris aims to continue increasing the public debt, which the Fed will monetize since Americans would never agree to any of this if they were directly taxed to pay for it all; and which debt monetization will effect the continued upward transfer of wealth from all of us peons to the ruling class of politically connected financial elites, while concurrently causing even further malinvestment and distortions of the market, resulting in unsustainable booms followed by the inevitable busts that are the necessary market corrections; and which corrections the Fed, as always, will try to prevent by doing even more of what caused the problems in the first place only on an ever greater scale.

It was the government and its partner in crime, the Federal Reserve, that caused the housing affordability crisis. Therefore, even more government interference in the housing market cannot possibly be the solution. The obvious solution is rather to get the government out of the housing market—and out of interfering harmfully in every other aspect of our lives, too, for that matter.

The key lesson neither Harris nor the Times will tell you, because they are too indoctrinated into the state religion to be able to comprehend its simplicity, is that the government cannot legislate away the law of supply and demand. Price fixing, including the Fed’s manipulation of interest rates, is the cause of so many problems and never the cure. Any government interference in our lives that results in an absence of true market prices is always and ever accompanied by harmful consequences that may be unintended but are hardly unforeseeable.

The key lesson the politicians and pundits will never explain to you is that government bureaucrats making decisions at best arbitrarily, assuming only benevolent intent and an absence of corruption (which is a dubious assumption, indeed), do not know better than the market with its pricing system how to efficiently allocate scarce resources towards productive ends as determined by the will of consumers, which is to say, by all of us. There is no more perfect manifestation of the democratic principle than the free market. We do not need the government to take care of us and to tell us what to do. Incessant government interference in our lives is neither necessary nor desirable!

The author of the Times article ludicrously argues that “markets, left on their own, often tend to concentrate power”, resulting in “fewer options, worse service, higher prices, lower pay, less innovation and generally less control of our economic lives”.

But that is exactly backwards. All of those harmful outcomes are precisely the outcome of government interventionism and our consequent inability to engage in voluntary exchange for mutual benefit absent harmful government interference. People think they live in “the land of the free”, but a free society is logically impossible when you have a government that will not allow any aspect of our lives remain un-interfered with.

This goes back to that point about how Kamala Harris is somehow going to enlighten us with her economic vision while blaming price inflation on corporate greed instead of properly informing Americans how the inflation, including the insanity in the housing market, was the natural and inevitable result of the COVID‑19 lockdown madness and the Fed’s response of dutifully monetizing the debt resulting from the government’s efforts to paper over the harmful economic consequences of that insane exercise in authoritarian governance.

The corporate greed we really need to be concerned about is that which leads corporations to try to circumvent market forces and instead utilize government force to achieve their financial aims, like the pharmaceutical industry. The problem is not that there is “corporate capture” of government agencies like the FDA and CDC but that such government agencies exist to be captured and utilized to advance the agenda of a few at the expense of everyone else.

But you don’t see Kamala Harris talking about that type of corporate greed, for the obvious reason. Who do you think she really aims to serve? Hmm? I’ll give you a hint: it’s not us. She’s all about serving the special interests that keep clueless politicians like her in power.

And to come back to Trump for a moment, let’s not forget how the lockdowns were implemented during his term in office; how he bragged about being responsible for “Operation Warp Speed” and the consequent treatment of the entire population as subjects of a mass uncontrolled experiment without informed consent; how his administration rolled out “stimulus” packages to try to paper over the harmful consequences of deliberately shutting down the economy, dramatically increasing the government debt and predictably resulting in a massive theft of our purchasing power (not “transitory” price inflation, mind you); how he treated Russia as an enemy despite campaign promises to pursue friendlier relations, pursued extreme Zionist policies in his support for Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians, and otherwise continued a basically neo-con foreign policy agenda; how he promised to “drain the swamp” but then kept people like Dr. Anthony Fauci in positions of power such as, in Fauci’s case, the president’s chief medical adviser; etc.

And while Trump and other Republicans eventually came around to opposition, Democrats, of course, were even more insanely pro-lockdown, and they remain unapologetic to the extraordinary harm caused by this authoritarianism, so it should come as no surprise to anyone that instead of acknowledging the real problem and cause of the housing affordability crisis, all we get from Harris’s admirers is the usual gibberish about how she will fix the problems caused by too much freedom in the marketplace with “public investment”, i.e., forcibly expropriating the fruits of your labor for redistribution according to her whims because you, dear peasant, are too stupid to know how to spend your own money and therefore need Kamala Harris and her ilk to decide how to spend it for you.

Then there is the matter of Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza, which has been supported by the Biden/Harris administration, would have been likewise supported by Trump had he been reelected, and has been defended by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., thus rendering vacuous his claim to be a defender of children and human rights.

During the recent Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed that Harris has been “working tirelessly to secure a ceasefire in Gaza”, which was certainly news to everyone actually paying attention to this issue.

But even if we assume for the sake of argument that it is true that she has been “tirelessly” involved in the Biden administration’s efforts, all that would mean is that Harris is totally on board with Biden’s support for Israel’s genocide.

Sure, we’ve heard since last year that the Biden administration has been working toward a ceasefire. But what that has really meant is that the administration worked tirelessly to provide Israel with the arms it has needed to perpetrate a genocide, to block ceasefire resolutions in the UN Security Council, and to announce a supposedly Israel-backed “ceasefire” proposal for the purpose of shifting the blame for the absence of a ceasefire onto Hamas when the truth is that the regime of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made clear from the start that it would not agree to ending its genocidal military campaign before achieving the stated aim of eliminating Hamas, only to a temporary pause involving an exchange of hostages, which is to be followed by a continuation of Israel’s criminal violence.

Agreeing to its own destruction along with the continued destruction of Gaza and indiscriminate massacre of Palestinian civilians is obviously a non-starter for Hamas, the antithesis of an actual ceasefire, and Israel has otherwise been making demands clearly intended to ensure that no ceasefire can be achieved. And the Biden/Harris administration cannot possibly be incognizant of how their “tireless” efforts to achieve a ceasefire have in fact been facilitating Israel’s genocide, but, you see, the narcissists, megalomaniacs, sociopaths, and psychopaths who exercise government power over you think that you are just too stupid to see through their ridiculous pretenses of benevolent intent.

Everyone participating in the US presidential election is, by the act of voting, legitimizing the outcome, which any sane person can foresee will be the perpetuation of the criminal activities of the regime in Washington, DC. For Americans to place faith in either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris to change this course for the country is completely irrational. It is up to free-thinking, rational Americans to effect real change, and a good first step would be to stop legitimizing your own disenfranchisement, consenting to servitude, and perpetuating the regime’s criminal violence and human rights violations.

Cross-posted from JeremyRHammond.com.

Collision Alarm: Terror on the Horizon

pakistanattacks

“I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation. War is hell.”

-William Tecumseh Sherman

I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. The indicators and warnings on the board are lighting up more often now than in the past.

I did a series this year called Storming America (Episodes 37, 41-43, 49-50) on the Chasing Ghosts podcast where I laid out the probabilities and architecture of an up-scaled 7 October 2023 Gaza-Israel complex terror attack on the US and the West. A complex terror attack is a coordinated multi-dimensional attack that takes place at the same time in multiple locations. I do not infer this hasn’t happened in the past but the perfect storm of new technology and weapons employment is changing by the decade. The element of synchronization of simultaneous attacks against soft and hard targets really compromises the decision loops and reaction cycles of centralized governments crippling their timely response to these attacks.

From Michael Collins’ complex attacks on British occupation forces in the UK-Irish war at the turn of the twentieth century and Beslan and everything in between, synchronized non-state military actors are accelerating their impact in this new era. I have spoken to the leveling of weapons technology and salvo competition that is increasing the effectiveness of developing and third world countries and their concomitant military capabilities against very sophisticated first world armies and navies.

And the simpler and less sophisticated militaries are winning again and again. Terror attacks are going through the same evolution.

The wind-up to these events is starting to cascade in frequency and ferocity that will not relent for the foreseeable future. It may time to bring back air raid sirens of old. And don’t think for second these new threats aren’t the result of the US meddling constantly in other nation’s affairs over the past 150 years.

Dateline Pakistan:

More than 70 people have been killed in four assaults amid several reported incidents of violence in Balochistan province in southwestern Pakistan, according to military and police officials.

The country’s military said 14 soldiers and police, as well as 21 militants, were killed in fighting after the largest of the attacks, which targeted vehicles on a major highway in Bela, a town in Lasbela district.

This is coming to the US and the West. Newton’s Third Law is a stone cold killer.

Prepare accordingly and buckle up.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/pakistan-over-70-dead-gunmen-storm-highways-execute-civilians-24-hours-terror

“And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beastsAnd I looked, and behold a pale horseAnd his name that sat on him was death, and hell followed with him”
– Johnny Cash, When the Man Comes Around

Email at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Honest Voices In The Intellectual Ecosystem

https://scotthorton.org/interviews/8-14-24-matthew-hoh-on-obamas-folly-in-afghanistan-and-recourses-for-managing-and-dealing-with-ptsd/

Libertarian Institute Director Scott Horton recently interviewed former USMC Captain / former State Department official Matthew Hoh.

Famously, Hoh resigned from a State Department post in Afghanistan in 2009 and valiantly attempted to convince President Barack Obama’s administration to not go forward with a planned military surge in Afghanistan. He tried to convince them to get the hell out of there instead. That’s 12 years before we finally got the hell out of there. In disgrace.

The Obama administration passed on Hoh’s facts-based warning of impending disaster. It marched headlong into the disaster. But something interesting happened. Instead of having his voice repressed, Hoh found himself constantly invited to appear on MSNBC and tell the truth about how unwinnable the Afghan War was. And MSNBC was “controlled by the White House.”

What the hell?

Hoh’s experience highlights that despite the state’s patronage of sycophants and psychopaths, reality always gets a vote. And those who speak truth to (and about) power can find a place in the intellectual ecosystem.

There are two kinds of intellectuals, those who serve the state and those who don’t.

Regime intellectual is a sweet gig. As long as one commits to core elements of the state’s point of view (government supremacist, domestic imperialist, pro-war) one can be as lazy and/or insane as one wants to be. Case in point: 1999’s Tyranny’s Ally, by David Wurmser. Here is a book that reads like it was penned by an inmate at Arkham Asylum:

“Anti-Americanism among pan-Arabic nationalists emerges from the same source as did.

Communist and Nazi anti-Americanism: the nature of tyrannical regimes. The hostility is a product of neither the U.S. presence nor its policies. Since the concept of enemy is essential to legitimize internal repression, neighbors or superpowers that represent ideas antithetical

to tyranny are particularly threatening to the tyrant and are thus considered the most dangerous of its foes. In the Middle East, those enemies are the United States and Israel—not because of what they have done, but because of who they are, what they represent, and the fact of

their existence.”

Crazy stuff. Although the part about “the concept of enemy is essential to legitimize internal repression” rings true. But the rest is kooky. Not only was Wurmser not committed to a hospital for the criminally insane, he became Middle East Adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney.

America does not have a monopoly on deranged regime intellectuals. A fascinating example in Russia is Alexander Dugin. An ultranationalist, his 1997 book The Foundations of Geopolitics reads like a Russian version of The Grand Chessboard. Dugin wrote:

“Then there is the Ukrainian issue. Ukrainian sovereignty is such a negative phenomenon for Russian geopolitics that, in principle, it could easily provoke an armed conflict. Without the Black Sea coastline from Ismail to Kerch, Russia gets such a long coastal strip, effectively controlled by who knows who, that its very existence as a normal and independent state is called into question.”

Actually, that doesn’t sound so crazy. But consider this passage from his 2009 book The Fourth Political Theory:

“American liberal Ayn Rand (Greenspan was one of her greatest admirers) has created an entire philosophy (“Objectivism”) based on the following blunt idea: if one is rich, then he is good. She

reached the limits of Weber’s idea about the origin of capitalism in the Protestant ethic and said that the “rich” is always and necessarily the “good” – almost a “saint”, while the “poor” is evil, lazy, bad, and corrupt – a “sinner”.”

Presenting Rand as the flag bearer of American Liberalism is so uncharitable as to be diabolical. Maybe not as delusional as Wurmser, but certainly tapped.

Anyway, regime publication Foreign Affairs called Dugin “Putin’s Brain” and portrayed his philosophy as driving the Russian state. Which is preposterous. Alex Hu explained Dugin’s role in The National Interest:

“…a cursory look at his career reveals that he is just one of many pawns in Putin’s curated media ecosystem. The regime’s “political technologists” are known to impersonally employ thousands of media personalities like Dugin to shape public opinion. These personalities do not control their public profile, nor do their ideas necessarily even reflect official policy. The regime also sponsors extremists and pseudo-oppositionists to make itself look moderate in comparison.”

One of those political technologists was Vladislav Surkov:

“As deputy head of the administration he would meet once a week with the heads of the television channels in his Kremlin office, instructing them on whom to attack and whom to defend, who is allowed on TV and who is banned, how the president is to be presented, and the very language and categories the country thinks and feels in.”

Apparently, even though Russia is a repressive autocracy and American is an enlightened democratic republic, the White House deploys the same media tactics as the Kremlin. Which brings us back to Hoh. He told Horton he believes the White House authorized MSNBC to platform him because it had accepted the truth about Afghanistan:

“They keep having me on. I’m on MSNBC so often that the makeup ladies keep my mixture of… makeup ready for me because I’m in there a couple times a week, you know. And why, why do they keep having this guy come on arguing to get out of Afghanistan? Well, it’s because Barack Obama couldn’t be seen as weak or soft, but he also knew that he could lose the reelection, because Afghanistan was another Iraq. So, we’re going to surge in Afghanistan and then what happens Scott right we’re going to start pulling out in the summer of 2011.”

Now imagine if there were no intellectuals like Matthew Hoh out there speaking the truth. Imagine if we were fully a nation of Wurmsers. Reality would still get a vote. And at some point, reality would overwhelm the false narratives. But we would have already marched into Hell and obliterated civilization, possibly the species.

So, give reality a hand and support honest intellectuals like Hoh and the cats at the Libertarian Institute. Donate Today!

 

 

 

 

 

Sealift Takes a Dump: The US Navy Continues to Degrade

spearhead

Another USN ship disaster in the offing. Contrary to what one would first think, this is tangential to the “IED* recruiting crisis.” This is due to a separate recruiting crisis in Military Sealift Command (MSC) caused by the extreme workloads the civilian mariners who crew these ships are subjected to – far in excess of what military sailors or mariners working in the civilian sector are expected to do.

The US Navy is, of course, not looking to the future and treating the oversight and incompetence as simply more tens of millions of dollars they can write off.

All 12 currently-active Spearhead-class fast transports.

These ships are militarized fast catamaran ferries and largely intended for use rapidly moving troops and equipment around inside of a given theater. The class is apparently a perfectly workable port-to-port ferry but totally unsuitable for the various amphibious warfare schemes the USN and USMC have tried to use for the emerging near-peer and peer littoral and blue water fights. But then again, the era of contested amphibious landings in the near-peer and peer fights with the ubiquity of missiles and inexpensive artillery is over.

The upshot of this is that the US military is going to lose enough high-speed, shallow-draft sea-lift capacity to move a brigade at a time from Point A to Point B. This suggests that the US is 1) de-prioritizing actually defending the Baltic States and Finland; (2) equally de-prioritizing the defense of the Southwest Pacific on land; or (3) both, given that seaborne troop movements are now going to have to rely on far more conventional amphibious shipping that will be wasted on ferry duty, or highly vulnerable commercial shipping.

Military Sealift Command has drafted a plan to remove the crews from 17 Navy support ships due to a lack of qualified mariners to operate the vessels across the Navy, USNI News learned.

The MSC “force generation reset” identified two Lewis and Clark replenishment ships, one fleet oiler, a dozen Spearhead-class Expeditionary Fast Transports (EPF) and two forward-deployed Navy expeditionary sea bases that would enter an “extended maintenance” period and have their crews retasked to other ships in the fleet, three people familiar with the plan told USNI News Thursday.

Based on the crew requirements on the platforms, sideling all the ships could reduce the civilian mariner demand for MSC by as many as 700 billets.

This is mostly infuriating because these ships are brand-new. In fact, they actually commissioned a new one in February 2024.

In April 2013, the EPF program was added to the remit of the Littoral Combat Ship Council, so that the capabilities of both ship types could be considered together conjoining it with one of the premier naval shipbuilding disaster of the new century. In 2014, the USN considered outsourcing the management of the fleet, but concluded that the ships would continue to be manned by civil service mariners.

What’s interesting here is that there are actually six of these ships extant or under construction but only the two forward-deployed hulls have been mentioned as in line for mothballing. I’d be on the lookout for the rest of the class being similarly deactivated in the near future, even though some of them are literally still on the slipways.

With the exception of those cuts (which make up a small amount of the total), however, the obvious conclusion is that the US Navy is cutting auxiliary vessels that don’t directly support its high-end battle fleet. This sort of retrenchment and specialization onto the “core mission” of fighting World War Three, however, carries the risk that – as usual – the next war will be with the people we weren’t planning to fight. The USN has already struggled mightily doing what was, objectively, a very simple humanitarian aid/disaster relief mission in Gaza… and equally-mightily keeping the Bab al-Mandeb open to Western shipping.

https://news.usni.org/2024/08/22/navy-could-sideline-17-support-ships-due-to-manpower-issues

The first five ships in the class will require additional work done to improve the superstructure, at a cost of $350k-$1.2M each. The remaining ships which are still various stages of construction will require upgrading following construction as well.

https://www.wired.com/2016/01/yar-the-navy-is-fixing-its-busted-high-speed-transport-ships/

H/T to armchairwarlord at Twitter

* IED = Inclusion, Equity and Diversity

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Anti-War Blog “Won’t somebody think of the children!”

Anti-War Blog “Won’t somebody think of the children!”

The French government has recently arrested and detained Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram. The alleged offence is that the messaging app is not policing and governing what it’s users do. So a national government has kidnapped and demands that the CEO give up access to the app. Currently Telegram is used to get information out of Gaza, with many on the ground reporting from the Palestinian side. It is also where most of the accurate reporting from both Russian and Ukrainian sources can be found from that ongoing war as individuals are sharing information and personal ordeals. It has been the pipeline of the common person on the ground from various conflict zones the world over.

As Dave DeCamp reports on Antiwar.com, Durov had been previously approached by the Russian government who wanted access to his platform. The US also had attempted to pressure Telegram to give up information on its users and supply them with the data that it may have. Fortunately Durov’s Telegram and apps like Signal remain free of such intrusions and the prying self interest of national governments, for now.

In the old days of the internet, this would have been widely viewed as a good thing, various perspectives and access to information from those witnessing events. PRIVACY. To have ones data and privacy respected. To not be spied on. To not have ones data sold, shared, intercepted, monitored and potentially edited or censored. PRIVACY. In 2024, the internet is no longer a frontier but rather a place of corporate and government jurisdictions where YOU are the product and are to be governed. It’s a permissive world.

Won’t somebody think of the children!”

The world is harsh, horrible and nature wants to eat or poison you. Attempting to make everything G rated is idiotic. Hoping to destroy every liberty under the pretence that some may be offended or in an attempt to deny nefarious actors the ability to do evil things is an impulse of hubris. In fact it is offensive to be so offended that freedom itself must be curtailed and prohibited. And for those claiming to care about children, let’s not forget that governments are currently intentionally starving and murdering scores of children. Most “smart” and “renewable” technology is made abundant in the opulent welfare states of the West because children in the poor nations recycle and mine the rare Earth so that you can constantly upgrade your toys. It’s where pollution is exported to the poorest.

Ross Ulbrycht, the inventor of the website Silkroad, remains in prison. It was alleged that assassins and drug dealers used his platform. Those interested should look into his case and the corrupt and unjust process the US government agents used to get him convicted. He invented a media platform so that others could use it freely. Freedom is illegal. The real crime was that individuals may have made money without the taxman knowing,government people not like.

Won’t somebody think of the children!”

Everything on the internet needs to be child friendly, in case a childrenperson walks into the room or needs to be so policed in case someone is doing a bad thing to a child. Under this fear all platforms can be brow beaten and bullied into complying with child killing governments. Because the monopoly on child abuse is sacred. Therefore privacy violated and censorship mandated across the board. Soon everything online will be Mr Beast and we know how much his origanisation loves children.

Any intimate message you may have sent to a lover, perhaps you have a personal conversation with a family member or need to spitball ideas among work colleagues. The devious eyes, ears and minds of government agents are magically omnipotent enough to be privy to such communications. Like human gods, the State has deemed itself and those who make it function the ultimate deity, it must know all. Remember when the lie of liberal democracy was that the government worked for the people, so much so that the people constantly lose their rights at the expense of the governments paranoia so that it can continue to serve the people. Whoever or whatever “the people” is, I am yet to know. Perhaps some day it may be AI that polices the net will serve a government master as easily as the ideological or monetarily motivated currently do. Then the AI may better know how to serve the people.

The argument is always that surveillance will be used to find terrorists and child sex traffickers. The great monsters that most can appreciate as being a threat. When the Israeli government and the company NSO developed Pegasus spyware, it was used by those governments that purchased it to predominately go after human rights activists and journalists. The pretence is always that child rapists and terrorists are the target, instead it’s those who dare to report on government corruption, abuse and murder. Those who would report on the rape and murder of children are likely to suffer from such surveillance rather than those doing the raping and murdering.

Whatever the platform or lack of platform, terrorists and child predators will lurk. Making every person suffer a regime of spying under the promise that these parties will be stopped is a lie of arrogant assumptions or blatant deception. Given that governments often dump child exploitation material into cyberspace, running their own websites in an attempt to entrap and “catch” pedos. The FBI itself became the worlds largest child porn distributor. I doubt that any of the victims in the released material gave their permission. But because a government did it, it’s not a bad thing?

The fascinating thing about government is that it’s apparently magical moral, when it blows up houses full of families, it’s righteous in doing so. It can distribute child porn, and it’s agents may view such content that an ordinary person would be jailed for doing. Remember that government lady who had thousands of dick pics that she had collected at work from her job of prying into peoples personal accounts or the cops who distribute USB’s of naked girls, taken from their phones when arrested? It’s alright cos gods.

Social media already has to succumb to the whims of various national governments allowing them to perve inside of your DM’s. To peruse your conversations and do with it as they please. When the depictions of East German secret police vans driving down streets with listening devices was viewed as vile. When dystopian fictions envisioned a world of no privacy, the State a supreme overlord of everything in your life, it was understood to be evil, to be wrong. Now, it’s 2024 and seemingly welcomed, desired or maybe just accepted. Vote One for more government!

I have nothing to hide,”mumbles the indifferent. Those who trust and believe in the status quo. The ability to pause, delay and edit messages also exist, so soon it won’t matter what you do or do not do. It will be up to those who invent and interrupt the evidence to decide. Perhaps some day nothing we witness through the screen can be trusted, or should be trusted. Either way, most will remain indifferent or care little. Those who work in government will shrug so long as they are paid and get that pension. The powerful monopoly has the monopoly on your privacy. Not just the local national government that taxes you and regulates your day to day, but those in foreign lands to. It’s a globalised spy ring.

The funny thing about those of us who think coercion is wrong, any form of it. Including when the magical government does it. One is ridiculed as being Utopian. Naive. Maybe that is true. The flipside, is that in not opposing such a thing, we inevitably end up in a dystopia. The union between well meaning intentions and the cynically apathetic who serve any master for pay make it possible. My solace is in knowing that dystopia’s are more like Terry Gilliam’s Brazil rather than anything Huxley or Orwell conjured up. You see, despite all of the putrid intrusions and murderous mercenaries, they are incompetent. While it will kill and imprison many, beneath all that paperwork and debt and hubris its a big fuckup. A clumsy, bloated, corrupt pile of shit that threatens, bribes, murders and steals. It functions because it bribes, for every true believer are scores who would do near anything for money. A jobs a job. It’s made up of people and if they are not ashamed of themselves for what they make possible, then the rest of us should be ashamed of them what they do. Few will own what they are complicit in and anyone who dare speak out, won’t even have a shadow to whisper in.

But please, won’t somebody think of the children.

Broken: The American Shipbuilding Crisis

usssullivans

USS The Sullivans sinking in New York in 2022. Over the decades, the destroyers have fallen into various states of disrepair. In April 2022, The Sullivans suffered a hull breach and partially sank at the Buffalo and Erie County Naval & Military Park in Buffalo, New York. The vessel had previously been observed taking on water. Despite undergoing repairs in the immediate aftermath of the sinking, additional work is required to make The Sullivans safe. 

The US can’t build ships that work.

The US can’t build ships that don’t work in volume.

The USS The Sullivans (DD-537) above is one the WWII Fletcher-class ships serving as a museum that started sinking due to poor maintenance.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) announced $10 million in funding to support preservation efforts for both The Sullivans and the Gato-class submarine USS Croaker (SS-246). The Buffalo and Erie Naval & Military Park will spearhead restoration efforts for both vessels, with the promised government funds covering approximately half of the expected $21 million that’ll be required.

These are museum ships and not naval ships of the line in current employment. Not only does the US Navy still have significant maintenance and refit problems for ships in the fleet but an existential crisis in shipbuilding capability.

Now the Congressional Research Service (CRS) has issued a scathing indictment of the Navy’s lack of ability to see its promises through for recapitalizing and struggling to reach the mythical 355 ship Navy with a current keel complement of 287 (it has been under 300 since August 2003). The august navalists have even floated the idea of a 381 ship Navy which is impossible. The Arleigh Burke class from 1991 was the last successful surface ship introduced by the US Navy and all the rest have been abject failures to include the Little Crappy Ships that are being retired five years into their thirty “service life”.

The CRS report may be one of the most succinct and concise indictments of decaying shipbuilding in the US to come out in years.

I read the CRS reports so you don’t have to.

The Navy fell below 300 battle force ships (the types of ships that count toward the quoted size of the Navy) in August 2003 and has generally remained between 270 and 300 battle force ships since then. As of May 28, 2024, the Navy included 296 battle force ships.

The Navy projects that 10 new ships will be delivered to the fleet in FY2025. The Navy’s FY2025 budget proposes retiring 19 existing ships in FY2025, including 10 ships that would be retired before reaching the ends of their expected service lives. As a result, the Navy projects that, under the Navy’s proposed FY2025 budget, the total number of ships in the Navy would decline by a net 9 ships during FY2025, from 296 ships at the start of FY2025 to 287 ships at the end of FY2025. The Navy’s budget submission projects that during the period FY2025-FY2029 (i.e., the years of the FY2025 Future Years Defense Plan [FYDP]), the Navy would include 287, 283, 280, 286, and 291 ships, respectively. Under the Navy’s FY2025 30-year (FY2025-FY2054) shipbuilding plan, the fleet would grow to more than 300 ships in FY2032 and reach a total of more than 381 ships in FY2042.

The math is impossible to do from here to there. On April 2, 2024, the Navy announced significant projected delays in several of its shipbuilding programs.

For press reports about the Navy’s announcement, see, for example: Megan Eckstein, “US Navy Ship Programs Face Years-Long Delays amid Labor, Supply Woes,” Defense News, April 2, 2024; Justin Katz, “Navy Lays Out Major Shipbuilding Delays, in Rare Public Accounting,” Breaking Defense, April 2, 2024; Nick Wilson, “Navy Shipbuilding
Review Details Delays across Submarine and Ship Acquisition Portfolio,” Inside Defense, April 2, 2024; Cal Biesecker, “Navy Confirms Delays In Shipbuilding Programs As Part Of Ongoing Review,” Defense Daily, April 3, 2024; Chris Panella, “As It Looks to Keep Its Edge over Rivals, the US Navy’s Biggest Shipbuilding Projects Are Delayed by Years, New Review Finds,” Business Insider, April 3, 2024; Joe Saballa, “US Navy Review Exposes Major Shipbuilding Delays in Nine Key Programs,” Defense Post, April 3, 2024; Thomas Black, “US Navy Shipbuilding Has Fallen Dangerously Behind,” Bloomberg, April 17, 2024; Lauren Frias, “See the 10 Types of New US Navy Warships Plagued by Shipbuilding Delays,” Business Insider, April 17, 2024; Steve Cohen, “Almost All Navy Shipbuilding Is Hopelessly Behind Schedule,” The Hill, May 2, 2024.

Shipbuilding delays are not only informed by a lack of dockyards but consistent delays in promised delivery.

The Committee notes the findings of the Navy’s 45-day Shipbuilding Review found significant delays to several critical shipbuilding programs. Notably, the review’s findings
revealed 12–16 months delay in lead boat construction of the Columbia-class submarine, 24–36 months delay in Virginia-class submarine construction, 18–26 months delay in delivering the third Ford-class carrier, and at least 3 years delay in the lead Constellation- class frigate. Recognizing the importance of fleet capacity in power projection and the Chief of Naval Operations’ new force-level goal of 381 ships, the Committee is increasingly concerned by the long-term impacts of these delays.

What makes these delays even more diabolical is that the Navy has consistently accepted ships that aren’t capable of achieving an operational status as warships on the line. It took five years for the ill-fated Zumwalt-class to bother firing a missile from its VLS in testing and the Ford-class carrier is still plagued by problems reliably launching and retrieving aircraft including the problem-ridden F35B/C aircraft which are humming along at a 30% operational readiness rate.

[T]he total number of battle force ships in the Navy reached a late-Cold War peak of 568 at the end of FY1987 and began declining thereafter.73 The Navy fell below 300
battle force ships in August 2003 and remained below 300 ships for the next 16 years. The Navy briefly returned to a level of 300 ships in early July 2020, for the first time in almost 17 years, subsequently fell back below 300 ships, reached 300 ships again briefly during periods in August and September 2022, and as of May 28, 2024, included 296 battle force ships [Ed: 287 ships at the end of FY2025].

The bottom line is that the shipbuilding capacity in the US (even using foreign shipbuilding assets) can’t cash the checks the US Navy is trying to cash.

No one has lost their job.

No one.

It’s time for sober defense officials to take a pause and completely reassess what a future US Navy looks like.

https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/RL32665.pdf

My Substack

Email at cgpodcast@pm.me

Surprise! Ukrainian Aid is Mismanaged

ukrdefense

One discovers that war-making by the West after WWII around the world started to see a trend that Smedley Butler would knowingly nod at as the sophisticated money-laundering complex to provide weapons and assistance in hundreds of conflicts.The tracking and auditing of these weapons transfers have not always been up to the standards one would expect responsible providers and agencies to employ to provision arms and assistance.

Well, the latest GAO report is out and the findings are not pretty and I think they underestimate the graft and criminality not only in the end use delivery in the Ukraine but where those weapons end up if not employed by the Ukraine forces and sold on the black or illicit markets (basically un-monitored & tracked exchanges or grants). Some savvy Western journalist can make their bones by forming a forensic investigation team that digs up where the money has gone, where the weapons have gone and where the weapons are showing up around the world. They can also try to discover how much money actually leaves the VA-DC corridor when transfers or grants to foreign military forces of legacy weapons and systems.

The imminent corruption possible in these transactions is huge because ultimately combat losses of donated item is an inevitable conclusion which can be fabricated to cover the tracks for illicit transfers o weapons and system to third party buyers.

As a matter of fact, it would be interesting to see how these weapons transfer programs have historically performed.

But on to the GAO report, I read these so you don’t have to.

The theme of all these recommendations is accountability for government funds and weapons allocations which one would think would be an actionable offense but you rarely see government officials held to account but then again, I would love for my readers to let me know who was fired or held accountable for the loss of American conflicts since 1945. What is curious is that these recommendations are made because the law as Congress and the executive function in the US declare by statute has been broken and no one is held accountable.

If the private sector did this with non-weapons modalities, they would be held criminally liable by the usual suspects at the DOJ.

screenshot 2024 08 21 at 07 53 41 ukraine u.s. agencies should improve tracking of authorized u.s. origin defense article transfers requested by foreign donors u.s. gao

My recommendation is if any violations occur at any process juncture, the transfer is frozen and the parties examined. But don’t expect that to happen. This is performative but nothing will change.

The U.S. and more than thirty international donors have provided security assistance to the government of Ukraine in response to Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. Among international donors, 25 European countries collectively pledged over $73 billion in security assistance to Ukraine as of April 30, 2024. For many of these countries, the pledges are equivalent to a significant percentage of their GDP and defense budgets.

The Departments of Defense (DOD) and State (State) have coordinated within the U.S. government and with foreign donors to develop and execute donation strategies to collectively address Ukraine’s needs. The agencies generally facilitate international donations of defense articles in three ways: 1) authorizing foreign donors to transfer U.S.-origin defense articles to Ukraine; 2) providing logistical support services, such as equipment delivery and maintenance; and 3) incentivizing donations by providing foreign military financing (FMF) to replenish defense articles donated to Ukraine. Of the $72 billion of U.S. security assistance, $6.33 billion is obligated for FMF. State has allocated FMF to 10 European countries that pledged security assistance to Ukraine.

That’s 73 billion dollars pledged.

To date [9 August 2024], we have provided more than $55.4 billion in military assistance since Russia launched its premeditated, unprovoked, and brutal full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and approximately $58.2 billion in military assistance since Russia’s initial invasion of Ukraine in 2014.

This is probably a low ball figure.

At least 30 countries have pledged over $148 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in 2022. This includes $2 billion worth of defense items of U.S. origin—such as missiles and ammunition—that foreign donors requested to transfer to Ukraine.

The State Department approves these transfers, and the Defense Department is required to monitor the items.

However, State hasn’t consistently shared approval information with DOD and neither DOD nor State verify the delivery of these transfers. DOD can’t effectively monitor these items. We recommended ways to improve information sharing and monitoring.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-24-106745.pdf

It’s worse than you think with simply this snapshot:

Between February 2022, when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and last June, the U.S. sent the beleaguered country $1.69 billion dollars worth of weapons that require a stringent form of tracking called enhanced end-use monitoring. Most such weapons are missiles, including anti-aircraft Stingers and anti-tank Javelins. Such monitoring includes tracking when the weapons are expended or lost. 

The inspector general’s investigators found that U.S. officials did not keep weapons tracking databases updated in a timely manner due to a host of problems, including under-staffing, security concerns, a failure to communicate across multiple federal organizations, and Ukraine occasionally providing information too slowly. 

https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/08/us-still-needs-improve-monitoring-arms-sent-ukraine-gao-finds/398950/

Would it be too hard to have a meta-database that tracks this?

Bottom line: no one knows the total money sent nor accounted for the weapons and aid sent remaining in Ukraine proper.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

“Breed More” They Demand

“Breed More” They Demand

Breed! Have more babies!” demands the technocrats on social media, the conservatives even, the religious zealots, even some socialists and naturally the incels who want the State to mandate wives. Apparently humanity needs to constantly swell, to grow in it’s population. To expand across the globe. In the last century the world’s population exploded beyond the billions, previously humanity was in the millions. Despite war, ideology and famines that wiped out millions, the human race kept on keeping on. Now, because there are declines apparently we need billions more babies otherwise humanity may fall from existence.

Mental health, welfare dependency and so on is also on the increase. National debts and the normalisation of mortgage everything is so widespread that it seems weird to not actually be in debt. The cost of living in the “affluent” nations is getting to the point that basically one must work in government, corporate sectors or be on benefits, or both or have side and above and down hustles. Just to get by. It seems everyone is living at the expense of one another, climbing over each others finances and borrowing. Or investing with borrowed money into bubbles. Capitalism is blamed by the communist affiliates and then those who advocate capitalism blame the State. Whatever it it, it’s not a free market so maybe a version of capitalism that requires the State and central banking is to blame.

So people seem less inclined to have babies. Many who have children moan about how hard it is being a parent, some in fact become professional parents. The State pays for them do be a parent. Others demand that employers pay for them to be a parent to have paid leave. Ones own nest egg, a violation of human entitlements. Then schools have parenting as a subject so that teachers and curriculum complicate what humanity had clearly done for generations, making it an academic and gradable act. Children, and adults for that matter are infantalised. The world has to be bubble wrapped, sanitised, and made G rated so that little Babyface can remain a protected little child and all the big bad realities of life are kept away. Professionals insist on their importance in each child’s lives, with needles, before and after and during school care they lean into regulations to make sure parents comply.

Near anyone can make a baby, it seems few can have a family. The conservatives and incels blame feminism and in the past the anti-alcohol religious types blamed abusive drunk men. Kids navigate broken homes, fifty-fifty care or see a parent once a week on the weekends, or every second weekend depending on what is negotiated. Some parents are absent, they just blow and go. Others never wanted a partner when they had little Babyface, so they go into partnership with the government. Co-parenting with the State. People tease girls that have “daddy issues”, men even use it as a disparaging term and yet never condemn the daddy who caused it. Women complain that males now want a Mummy, a cook, a maid someone to watch them play video games even though both bring income in. ‘But he bread winner cos he be man’ so the manosphere grifters explain in between affiliate marketing and crypto lectures. Step dad’s are called “cucks” and gay parents are viewed as “pedos”, it’s better single mothers stay single and children remain un-adopted.

The children of Asia, those whose parents worked themselves to death, are becoming less inclined to breed. The salary men of Japan and those who survived the “One Child” policies of China, where girls were undesired have parented children who are wary of being like their parents. In China female infants were abandoned and left to die, so that parents could have a boy. The youth generations ask, “what’s the point?” Japan is a nation of debt, described as living in the “year 2000”, from 1970 to now. China and Korea seem much the same, children must study, get good government or corporate jobs. Work hard, make money. Make money…make more money…security is in money. Make it, go into debt to make more money or buy things to make more money. Oh yeah, don’t forget to breed.

And so here we are with lonely generations. People not wanting to date or unable to. Youth not interested in having kids or not more than the two point three required to “grow” the nation state. Nazi Germany would give breeding medals to mothers who bred large numbers of offspring. The Nazi State needed workers and soldiers. The youth see their parents struggling, are schooled on the profession of parenting, parents moan about how hard it is being one, each child is raised as though it’s allergic to life itself, helicopter parents and paternal government have monetised, regulated and professionalised what was once love. Love, doesn’t matter for those who insist we all need to breed. I wonder why some are now wary to be bred?

Love is not an ideal, it’s not material construct, autistic tech bro’s can’t speculate on it’s value and it doesn’t make for a cool skin in whatever game is trending and it’s not an NFT, remember them. Instead it’s a relationship. If one is to have a child, breeding and being insisted upon to breed becomes a frightening dystopian circus or at worse it hearkens back to fascist or communist ideology where humans are needed as workers. Good little proletariat children. And, as some have so blatantly implied, children are an investment. They will take care of you. Think about that, breeding life so that it may take care of you when you age. Perhaps those advocating for the creation of life need to understand that there is more to life that servitude, investments or even biological gene spreading. Netflix has already done a special on that “hero” of the cause.

Maybe the problem isn’t that those who are reluctant to have kids are being selfish or infected by some feminist ideology. Rather those who claim one must or should have kids are panic mongering and insisting on it for selfish reasons themselves. The collectivist absurdity of it all has not created a community, it’s alienated aspects and expects others to work harder and to become beholden to others lifestyle choices. It’s not voluntary and communal. It’s parasitic and dependent. Hardly a grand role model for life. Those who claim to champion the culture war have failed to see the dark reflection in the mirror, set an example, be the good person, lover, parent or child. It starts at home. But alas like everything now, it’s a political issue and incentives will rise so that people breed for tax breaks or bonuses. Those who see a child as more than financial will be punished or remain child free.

There are social media groups for parents who share their regrets in being a parent. They discuss the pressures to breed, to have a family. Some hate their kids. Just as kids may hate a parent or parents. Apathy or hate within a family is almost normal. Complaining and outwardly denigrating child or parent frequent for some. Those who believe in a deity will claim that is what’s lacking. More faith, more belief. Being a loving person doesn’t require the fear of god. It turns out not everyone wants or should be a parent or simply have not felt secure in life or their relationship to take on that responsibility, to build a family.

Breed, or don’t, it’s up to you. Good people are valuable. They are more than just cum and eggs. More people for the sake of it, doesn’t lead to better people but people for the sake of making people. In the end a lot of the advocates for the breed more crowd, seem to use their family as a prop or assume every relationship should be the same or simply don’t even consider love being a factor in having a family at all. There is more to a woman than her eggs, she is not mandated or obligated to be bred. Just as there is more to a man than his seed. If either are not inspired to have kids, then it may say more about others than it does them. As Rodney Dangerfield once said, “the best thing about kids is making them,” so have fun and breed but there is more to creating life than providing genetic matter. The world doesn’t necessarily need more people, just better loving ones. That love starts in your own home.

 

August, 2024

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest