Blog

Anti-War Blog – Cowardice of Mass Murder

Anti-War Blog – Cowardice of Mass Murder

In the immediate aftermath of a tragic event it’s difficult to find clarity of facts and thoughts through a miasma of lies, unknowns and emotions. The impulse to collectivise, derive explanation from demographic classification is both primal and learned. Just as the impulse to find simple answers. A father and son, acted as individuals with deranged rationalisation and murdered innocent and unarmed people at Bondi, Sydney this weekend. At this time, fifteen people are dead.

Despite the propaganda pushed by mostly American media and content creators, Australians still have access to legal firearms. There are more firearms in the hands of licensed gun owners than before the gun buy back scheme, a reactionary policy to the Port Arthur massacre. The Bondi murderers used legally owned firearms. We can see one of the killers operate a bolt action rifle as he does harm. For many, it’s a simple solution. Make guns illegal. Like drugs and murder itself, the legality of an act or item does little to deter those who would use or do vile things. Prohibition is the inclination for governments to impose, and a simple solution for a population of dependent people. As a reaction, Australian politicians have already promised more gun control laws.

From the Bondi killings, we have numerous angles and views recorded on mobile devices, giving us a voyeurs keyhole from which we can speculate and derive perspective. It’s true, if some there were armed, they could have shot back and it would be over. Unfortunately in modern Australia, only the government, some private security and by definition criminals carry in public. In the moments before unarmed Ahmed el Ahmed tackled and disarmed one of the killers, we see one of what is alleged to be up to four armed police officers hiding, cowering and not responding to the killing. As well as a police vehicle drive past, not stopping to engage. Ahmed, once he disarms the murderer is unable to kill him. He has no idea how to use a firearm. He is after all a common Australian. Guns now are an abstract for video games, movies and the government or in this case criminals to have. Skill at arms, or basic firearm fundamentals are for a past Australia, the age of the Digger and Outback wrangler, a reputation modern Aussies benefit from, while having little in common with.

Only the police should have guns, will be the cry. And despite having armed police visibly present, twenty minutes passed before the killers were stopped. Not too long ago, in gun touting Texas, the Uvalde police stood by for over an hour while a killer went on a murderous rampage against children in a school. The parents prevented by those same police from saving lives, their own children’s. Instead the government agents stood by, and did little other than buffer parent from child. Innocent people died because of such coerced dependency. Inside of Australia, dependency in all areas, has become cultural.

Bondi not too long ago was the scene of a mass stabbing. The entitled arrogance of a man who killed numerous people, his target women. It took a female officer, acting on her own inclinations and instincts as a protector to stop him. The security in the mall, where the murdering occurred were unarmed. They did little to deter the murderer as he walked through, killing and wounding the innocent. In his mind he was steeled by a deranged self righteousness. When, there is numerous victims, it’s called terrorism. Otherwise, in other contexts it’s a diagnosis of mental health. Whether narcissism, ideology, religion or whatever steers these individuals, their mental health seems to be at the whims of those who determine through profession or agenda their categorisation and thus criminality. The father and son from the weekend are terrorists, mental health status no longer applies now that it’s deemed a political act.

In China, a police state where firearms are hard for law abiding people to possess, meat cleavers are the weapon of choice among deranged individuals. In 2010 several incidents saw attacks with cleavers mostly directed against children. In one attack seven children and two adults were murdered by a man in a preschool. Soon after another man stabbed eight children in Fujian province. Later in the year, an elderly woman and young child were cleaved to death by a man near a school. In 2014, a man severely injured eight children as they played near a school in Hubei province. In March of that year, at Kunming Railway Station, eight separatists stabbed thirty five people to death and injured one hundred and forty three others. In 2019, a man killed eight children at a school with a meat clever. The motivation of these men all spiteful and arrogantly entitled, whether determined as mentally unwell, politically motivated or otherwise. They targeted the most vulnerable, where no one was likely there to stop them during their twisted attacks. The putrid mindset of such killers is self serving, regardless of the tools they use to do harm.

Prohibition will reign in conjunction with censorship on information, imagery and communications. The authority is absolute and so long as there remains an existential threat, whether an object, ideology or pariah nation then the authority needs more power, the threat ever more apparent. It’s unlikely the cleaver attacks in China occurred because of social media posts, and just as video games, Marilyn Manson or ten pin bowling did not inspire the 1999 Columbine murderers, blame will always be sought regardless.

For those who are nativist and anti-migration, the imagery of a father and son, brown skinned, Muslim and from Pakistan is confirmation that all of them are alien invaders, A danger to a pure, mostly white, homogenised nation. Whether we delve back to the skin colour of Martin Bryant, not to mention the men responsible for two separate mass killing events in Australia during 1987. The Hoddle Street massacre saw seven killed and nineteen wounded by Julian Knight, a home grown man. Or, the Queen Street massacre later that year when Frank Vitkovic killed eight and injured five in his rampage. Across the Tasman in New Zealand, Brenton Harrison Tarrant, an Australian born supremacist killed fifty-one people and injured forty in a Mosque during his 2019 frenzy. Not to mention famous child killer, Bevan Spencer von Einem who recently died while under the protection of the State in prison who was also born on the soil where he took the life of the innocent. Norwegian neo-Nazi, Aneers Behring Breivik murdered seventy-seven people in 2011, many of them teenagers.

It would be dangerous and disingenuous to assume race or religion is the reason for killers to act as they do. The malicious act to take life based on a set of values or perverse need, transcends race or religion. Overseas, while in uniform, such killers may as well be awarded a medal for similar conduct, under certain circumstances and could even write a best selling book, to have a movie made based on such bloody exploits. Context, even if the victims are unarmed civilians can be conjured. There will be those in equally deplorable circles who will see these two killers as heroes because of who, or why they killed. This past August celebrated the eightieth anniversary of the droppings of the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, there was no shortage of commentary celebrating in the mass murder of innocent people, including children who were not even born when the war started.

When we see through smart phones, on local soil the killings of the familiar, those like us. It’s unacceptable, an intrusion. Reprehensible. When the killings are done over there, in the distant frontiers relegated to policy and imperial ambition, the dead are meaningless, statistics to dismiss. Such is the privilege of perspective. The innocent dead are not props for the stage of misery, yet many minds think otherwise.

The intended victims of the father and son killers at Bondi, were Jewish people. It is assumed the attacks were motivated as punishment for Israeli policies in Gaza and elsewhere. The innocent civilians in Australia, seemingly fair game to the killers who through their vile logic see them as representatives of the State of Israel. Some have argued it’s anti-semetic, while others are steering it as anti-Zionist or anti-Israel. Regardless the murder of innocent people is horrible and unjust, despite the rationales of murderers. If it’s the dropping of bombs on a city full of sleeping families, the mass starvation of millions including children, or the sniping of beach goers because they may have a passport to Israel, all should be seen as repulsive.

Anti-migrant voices, anti-gun advocates, anti-Muslims, even atheists will look at the event and use it as a conclusion of confirmation. Then one can delve into the conspiracies, every mass murder event finds those making claims of crisis actors or it’s a manipulative act to steer public opinion and justify more laws. It takes very little for government to push more laws. Crisis never goes to waste. The lack of critical thinking is a growing concern, especially among the terminally online. Some of which assume every event is staged and fake, concocted for them in an attempt to manipulate. Anecdotally, I have had people who are convinced AI animal slop videos, or Mr Beast content are all credible and legit, while to them murder is staged.

Some critics of Israel, have also speculated this event may be a Mossad operation. The trouble with entities such as Mossad, the CIA or even ASIO is there is no reason to ever trust them. Their histories are marred in lies, deception and violence and even glaring incompetence. In turn, the distrust is reasoned, due to increased criticism of the Israeli government for its genocide in Palestine, there is a need to manipulate and re-direct opinion by staging anti-Jewish violence. The Pulse Nightclub massacre was committed by a man who was motivated by his revulsion at US foreign policy, as was the terror attacks of September, 2001. Individuals can and will do horrible things as reaction to horrible things. The entire war on terror, which killed millions and ruined millions more lives was itself a self righteous reaction to a reaction of violent policies. The cycle of violence and reactions is ongoing, whether conducted by criminals, terrorists, governments or individuals. Many media outlets already tend to omit details about the genocide, or praise Israeli operations in Palestine, it’s unlikely there is a need to concoct a murder conspiracy such as this.

For those who do draw a collectivist reasoning in the recent Bondi mass murder, I wish to quote some feminists, “Not all men, but some how always a man.” And, while this is often dismissed outside the female dominated spectrum, because most people in general understand it to be a slur to assume all men as violent predators. The above mentioned are all males. So, using the same set of demographic profiling, collectivist reasoning, the feminist framing is as, if not more valid. As for prohibitions, I have also heard it said, “men rape with a penis so therefore it’s a weapon that should be removed.“ Again, we understand the appendage is not the problem. The mind who wields it is.

Politicians and the government will usually react the same way, granting itself more power. Even though we can see agents from the government cower and fail to protect. To outsource not just rights, but our entire everything to this monopoly, because it satisfies responsibility and obligation, despite failing has become a common belief. Dependency, ideology and collectivism allows for us to find simple solutions, to kick the can down the road for the next generation to deal with. Unfortunately as attention spans shorten, the rugged individual is bred out, government swells and timidity thrives, dependency will surge. And, every so often deranged and vile humans will, despite the laws, censorship, prohibitions, surveillance, do terrible things. If you see the world in collectives, can’t see individuals as unique and distinct, then that’s on you. If you think every solution requires coercion and collective punishment, censorship and prohibition, sadly you may be in a majority, the mob. That doesn’t make it a better or safer world.

The Kyle Anzalone Show: Zionist Meltdown as Control Over Narrative Evaporates

The old script is breaking. When anyone can watch unfiltered footage from Gaza on a phone, the gap between official talking points and visible reality becomes too wide to ignore. We dig into how that shift is changing minds, reshaping alliances, and exposing the cost of selective morality—especially around the meaning of “never again.” If genocide is always wrong, it cannot be bracketed by time, place, or politics. That stance doesn’t excuse anti-Semitism; it rejects it while refusing to let state violence hide behind history.

We also track an unexpected realignment on the American right. Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene are openly challenging the reflexive pro-Israel position that defined GOP orthodoxy for years, and their audience is listening. That split matters as the White House pursues a UN “board of peace” for Gaza and Netanyahu flatly denies any path to a Palestinian state. The contradiction is stark: promise a distant future while entrenching control now. Listeners hear the euphemisms, then see the footage, and trust the evidence.

Inside Israel’s government, rhetoric turns hardline. Itamar Ben Gvir’s calls for targeting Palestinian leaders and denying a Palestinian people aren’t fringe outbursts; they’re signals from power. Tamping down translation tools or burying posts won’t hide them. Meanwhile, in Washington, Trump praises Mohammed bin Salman, brushes off Khashoggi, and greenlights high-stakes deals—F-35s and possible nuclear cooperation—that will ripple across the region and complicate any Iran diplomacy. Every exception becomes a precedent; every double standard weakens leverage.

What cuts through the noise is a consistent ethic: protect universal rights, oppose collective punishment, and confront bigotry without silencing criticism of any state. If you’re ready for an honest, evidence-first conversation that refuses false binaries and respects your intelligence, hit play, share with a friend, and tell us where the narrative first broke for you. Subscribe, leave a review, and keep the debate real.

Pentagon Fraud and Accounting Errors: Feature and Not Bug

screenshot 2025 12 10 at 14 08 29 gao 25 108191 dod financial management accelerated timelines needed to address long standing issues and fraud risk

2028.

The plan is to spend four trillion more before they can deliver on proving where the money is going. You can’t make this up. I read the GAO reports so you don’t have to.

If fraud was a Ferris wheel, it would be shaped like the Pentagon.

The Marine Corps is the only organization to complete an audit and they comprise one percent of all DoD spending.

One percent.

As previously discussed, the Marine Corps was able to obtain and sustain a clean audit opinion in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 largely through a substantive-based audit approach and manual effort. The Marine Corps’ auditor noted that it performed a substantive-based audit approach, which included more than 70 site visits and testing of approximately 26 million assets. According to DOD, it was an all-hands effort to complete the Marine Corps audit. According to the total assets the DOD OIG reported in the fiscal year 2024 DOD agency financial report and the military service agency financial reports, the Marine Corps accounts for 1 percent of DOD’s assets.

There is one solution: freeze the pentagon spending machine until they can prove they know how to spend responsibly and provide accountability for whre the money goes.

Don’t hold your breath.

DOD’s financial management and business systems modernization has been on our High Risk List since 1995. We testified that, while DOD has taken steps to address this issue, it needs to do more in areas like action plans and demonstrating results.

Additionally, the full extent of fraud affecting DOD is unknown, so we’ve expanded this High Risk area to include fraud risk management.

Finally, DOD continues to face long-standing financial management issues as it works towards getting a “clean” audit opinion—i.e., when financial statements are presented fairly and are consistent with accounting principles.

https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-25-108191/index.html?_gl=1*kxb3ap*_ga*NDQ3NTE5NzMwLjE3NjUzOTMyOTQ.*_ga_V393SNS3SR*czE3NjUzOTMyOTMkbzEkZzEkdDE3NjUzOTMzMjUkajI4JGwwJGgw

No Right To Repair: The Bandits Win Again

Airpower anytime, anywhere: ABDR teams enhance DoD aircraft sustainment  processes > Air Force Sustainment Center > Article Display

No one knows how to innovate better than the actual users of end-items and the Congress has manged to throw another bone to a bloated and ineffective bureaucracy by destroying right to repair for the services.

US lawmakers have removed provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act for 2026 that would have ensured military members’ right to repair their own equipment.

The final language of the NDAA was shared by the House Armed Services Committee on Sunday, after weeks of delays pushed the annual funding bill to the end of the year. Among a host of other language changes made as part of reconciling different versions of the legislation drafted by the Senate and the House of Representatives, two provisions focused on the right to repair—Section 836 of the Senate bill and Section 863 of the House bill—have both been removed. Also gone is Section 1832 of the House version of the bill, which repair advocates worried could have implemented a “data-as-a-service” relationship with defense contractors that would have forced the military to pay for subscription repair services.

This adds yet another layer to the gargantuan defense budget and potential savings yielded  by letting the servcies repair their own equipment which usually leads to improvements on the way things are made and used in the fight.

The move is a blow to the broader right-to-repair movement, which advocates for policies that make it easier for device users, owners, or third parties to work on and repair devices without needing to get—or pay for—manufacturer approval. But while ensuring repair rights for service members did not make the final cut, neither did the competing effort to make the military dependent on repair-as-a-service subscription plans.

“For decades, the Pentagon has relied on a broken acquisition system that is routinely defended by career bureaucrats and corporate interests,” wrote senators Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Democrat, and Tim Sheehy, a Republican of Montana, in a joint statement shared with WIRED. Both support right-to-repair efforts and were behind the language in the Senate version of the NDAA. “Military right to repair reforms are supported by the Trump White House, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, entrepreneurs, small businesses, and our brave service members. The only ones against this common-sense reform are those taking advantage of a broken status quo at the expense of our warfighters and taxpayers,” they say.

The train of innovation has been derailed again.

https://www.wired.com/story/the-military-almost-got-the-right-to-repair-lawmakers-just-took-it-away/

Royal Navy Submarine Force is Not “Fit for Purpose”

Nuclear-armed submarine suffered malfunction

Vanguard class nuclear submarine

But with all the scientists and engineers imported from Africa into the UK, how is this even possible?

On a more serious note, it is high time for America to suspend its maintenance program of the Trident systems the UK uses.

Yet another Islamic nuclear armed nation is not in the interests of the US.

The replacements should have been coming into service in 2024, not 2032 like they are.

The issues are mainly about the Royal Navy’s ship and submarine R+D design center at Bristol being closed in the early ’90s. Which meant that ship manufacturers who had previously been given a 95% complete ship/submarine design. Had to design the whole ship)submarine from scratch. Whereas previously they’d just chosen which ovens, microwaves, washing machines binks etc. to install.

There weren’t enough orders in the ’90s for SSN subs to follow on from the Vanguard class. This led to a multi year gap in production. With all of the workers being laid off. The better ones got new jobs away from Barrow-In-Furness and the rest had skills that decayed.

The submarine overhaul and scrapping base at Devonport. Was neglected for years. With the Health and Safety Executive prohibiting it from carrying out scrapping duties in about 2000 and it wasn’t in the mid 2010s expected to be able to resume scrapping until 2020+.

The replacements should have been coming into service in 2024, not 2032 like they are.

This has been a consistent problem in the UK for years.

“Dreadnought is late, Astute class submarine delivery is getting later, there is a massive backlog in Astute class maintenance and refitting, which continues to get worse, and SSN-Aukus is a submarine which is not going to deliver what the UK or Australia needs in terms of capability or timescale.

“Performance across all aspects of the programme continues to get worse in every dimension. This is an unprecedented situation in the nuclear submarine age.

“It is a catastrophic failure of succession and leadership planning.”

mmm

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2143258/britain-incapable-maintaining-nuclear-submarine

 

 

 

The Kyle Anzalone Show [GUEST] Craig Pasta Jardula : Is Trump Imploding?

A kitchen joke about tomato sauce quickly gives way to the hard edge of politics as we unpack a growing fracture on the right. Trump’s volleys at Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie aren’t just personality drama; they point to a deeper shift toward a larger security‑state posture and a party that now tolerates the same speech controls it once condemned. We break down NSM‑7 and what “disrupt” really signals when it’s assigned to the FBI, CIA, DHS, and even the IRS: pre‑crime logic entering mainstream governance.

The tension doesn’t end there. Israel’s war in Gaza has become a litmus test that cuts through spin and divides the base from party elites; younger voters see the footage daily and reject euphemisms. Add the Epstein files, where demands for transparency meet political deflection, and the cracks widen. We connect those fights to kitchen‑table realities: stubborn inflation, housing out of reach, and childcare costs that devour paychecks. When material conditions tighten, slogans fade, and trust shifts to whoever delivers clarity and results.

Then we turn south to Venezuela. Craig “Pasta” Jardula, drawing on on‑the‑ground election observation across Latin America, challenges the default narrative that Maduro’s win is purely fraudulent. He notes the valid concern over ballot access while explaining why opposition “evidence” wouldn’t pass a courtroom test and why regional systems are often more transparent than U.S. critics admit. We also dismantle the “narco‑state” talking point and refocus on the true origin of America’s fentanyl disaster: a pharma‑driven addiction pipeline and policy failure at home.

War talk looms, but we explain why invading Venezuela would be a catastrophic misread—terrain, air defenses, trained militias, and a fiercely held sense of sovereignty. Sanctions already serve the aim of internal fracture; escalation only feeds the military‑industrial complex. The thread tying it all together is simple and urgent: foreign policy choices shape life at home. Roll back the security creep, protect open debate, stop laundering domestic pain through distant wars, and invest in outcomes people can feel.

If this conversation challenged your assumptions or sharpened your view, follow and subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with the one moment that hit hardest. Your feedback helps us push for smarter, freer policy debates.

Pinker on Peace and Enlightenment

“If, despite impressions, the long-term trend, though halting and incomplete, is that violence of all kinds is decreasing, I think that calls for a rehabilitation of the ideals of modernity and progress, and it’s a cause for gratitude for the institutions of civilization and enlightenment.” –Steven Pinker

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest