If you’ve ever watched an AI tool answer a complicated question with total confidence, you’ve felt the power problem hiding in plain sight. We sit down with journalist Nick Cleveland-Stout of Responsible Statecraft and Drop Site News to trace how Israeli influence operations are pushing narratives about Gaza directly into the systems people now use as “truth machines,” from chatbots to AI-powered search.

We break down the reporting on millions spent to shape chatbot responses, including networks of pro-Israel websites designed to be scraped, cited, and absorbed into training data. Nick explains what he tested, what he found in real chatbot citations, and why “LLM poisoning” matters even when users never click a single link. We also talk about Foreign Agents Registration Act disclosures, why these campaigns target broad public opinion after October 7, and what it means when safeguards seem stronger for some foreign influence efforts than others.

Then we zoom out to the broader ecosystem: targeted ad pushes on X, YouTube campaigns with massive view counts, and paid placements that aim to shore up conservative support. To close, we turn to a different kind of influence story with huge stakes, Trump’s reported purchases of defense stocks and the conflicts-of-interest questions that follow when arms makers profit alongside expanding defense budgets and war.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Podcast (kyle): Play in new window | Download

A progressive primary upset turns into something much bigger when you follow the money and the message. We’re rolling solo and starting with what last night’s results suggest about where U.S. politics is heading: foreign policy is no longer a side issue. When wars drag on, when Israel and Iran dominate headlines, and when voters feel the cost through inflation and gas prices, they vote accordingly. I also unpack why the “jihadist” and “communist” scare talk misses the actual story, and how race-first politics on both fringes poisons any real populist reform.

Then we pivot to a story that should be front-page news for anyone who flies. A Wired report points to GPS jamming tests near White Sands Missile Range and how interference can spill hundreds of miles beyond a test site. When multiple aircraft lose GPS at once, pilots and controllers get forced into backup modes under pressure. We talk through the reporting around a civilian medical flight that crashed into a mountain at night after GPS disruption, and why this raises urgent questions about military tech, FAA readiness, and public accountability.

From there, we head to the Middle East for a fast-moving update: tanker incidents, reported Iran Oman talks over Strait of Hormuz routing and tolls, and the broader negotiating game between Tehran and Washington. I play a Trump clip on the 2015 Obama Iran nuclear deal and explain why undoing that framework makes any future settlement messier and more dangerous. We close with Gaza, separating talk of Hamas disarmament from the on-the-ground reality of continued territorial control and stated Israeli policy.

If you want clear, detailed analysis without the spin, subscribe, share the show, and leave a review so more people can find it.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Podcast (kyle): Play in new window | Download

“We don’t want regime change… but the regime has to change.” That line tells you almost everything about how Washington talks itself into bigger wars, and why the US Iran conflict keeps drifting from one stated goal to the next. We sit down with Lt Col Karen Kwiatkowski to sort out what’s real, what’s posturing, and what the incentives look like behind the curtain as Trump alternates between strike threats and sudden stand downs.

We dig into the reported faction fight inside the White House between escalation minded voices and officials trying to slow the spiral, plus the hard constraint nobody can spin away: munitions, interceptors, and readiness. Karen explains why regime change is not a strategy, why “opening the Strait of Hormuz” is often used as a slogan instead of an operational objective, and how a lack of cultural and political understanding of Iran leads to reactive decisions that cost lives and credibility.

Then we widen the lens to the regional chessboard. If the US is weakened, overextended, and seen as unreliable, who gains freedom of action? We talk about Israel’s incentives, America’s intelligence dependence, and the disturbing report that CENTCOM sought “creative and unconventional” ideas to punish Iran, a sign of strategic confusion rather than serious planning. We also unpack the Pentagon leadership and career pipeline that can reward recklessness while punishing accountability.

If you care about US foreign policy, Middle East escalation, national security decision making, and what to watch next, this conversation will sharpen your radar. Subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with your take: what’s the clearest off ramp from here?

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Podcast (kyle): Play in new window | Download

A viral interview raises an uncomfortable question: what does it mean when a high-profile US political influencer sits down with a commander tied to the Azov movement and the “clean up the optics” answer is basically no? We take that clip seriously, not as clickbait, but as a window into how the Ukraine war is sold to the public, how propaganda works when facts are inconvenient, and why the neo-Nazi imagery controversy never actually went away.

From there, we pull on a bigger thread that keeps showing up in foreign policy: the push to connect wars into one narrative. We talk about the incentives for Ukraine to tie itself to an Iran-centered conflict, what Israel’s leadership may want, and how US priorities shift when munitions, media attention, and political will are finite. We also dig into the hard part that rarely gets discussed honestly: even if you think a war is provoked or justified, what is the endgame, and what happens to public opinion when strikes land inside Russia?

We then pivot to US politics and the pro-Israel lobby ecosystem, reacting to John Fetterman’s meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu and what that symbolism says about party discipline, image management, and who gets rewarded. After that, we highlight journalist Sam Husseini confronting Chuck Schumer, and why real accountability often only happens when someone is willing to get shoved out of the room for asking the question.

Finally, we unpack the “Morocco invaded Spain” claim by looking at Ceuta, asylum pathways, Abraham Accords-era leverage, spyware, and how migration routes tie back to destabilization across North Africa and the Sahel. If you care about Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, NATO, and the Israel lobby, this conversation connects the dots. Subscribe, share the show, and leave a review with the part you think the media is getting most wrong.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Podcast (kyle): Play in new window | Download

Dave DeCamp from Antiwar.com reported in a recent piece that the Pentagon admitted in its annual report to having committed two large-scale massacres against civilians in Yemen. The Pentagon acknowledged that hundreds of civilians, including children were killed and injured in a series of strikes.

A public and open admission of war crimes. Another in an endless series.

There has been an ongoing war against Yemen over the past decade, the United States and it’s coalition of Gulf nations have imposed embargoes and inflicted attacks on the populace. An act of punishment against the Houthi (Ansar Allah) leaderhip, who replaced the pro-Saudi regime. The Houthi also fight Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and their affiliates. As is often with the case of US foreign policy, Al Qaeda and the United States are on the same side in their war against the Houthi’s and the people of Yemen. The Saudis and UAE at times co-operate and co-ordinate with Al Qaeda in the region, thus aligning the US with the terror organisation.

Meanwhile, the people of Yemen continue to suffer. Before the genocide in Gaza, it was the crisis and mass starvation and attacks on the Yemeni civilian population which was of dire concern for humanitarian organisations. The coalitions attacks on Yemen, included school busses full of children and other targets which were very unlikely to have anything to do with the Houthi’s or insurgent fighters. The policy of killing innocent people is one which terror organisations and their supposed government enemies-allies have in common.

The US Congress and people now know that they murdered more innocent civilians in a foreign policy campaign which most citizens likely have no knowledge about, or interest in. And still, the US government wages it’s war against Yemen, along with other African nations such as Somalia. Lost beneath the coverage of the war against Iran, the Russian-Ukraine war and Israels invasion of Palestine and Lebanon, the US has bombed Somalia over sixty times this year already.

Attacking Somalia has been a constant action from both the Trump and Biden regimes. Just as the war on Yemen has taken on little notice among the US public, their governments war on Somalia goes on in an open manner where apathy and entitled exceptionalism assumes the right of the US military to attack anyone it wishes. Civilian casualties are a price the American public is willing to pay, so long as their government decides to continue the wars.

Perhaps it’s apathy. Maybe, it’s a form of privileged fatigue for the Westerner among the doom scrolls, occasionally seeing a dead baby. Those in the attacked nations, die and cry. They suffer. The exceptionalism is immense, that the US or any Western power, or nation of power may do as it pleases with imperial interest, naked aggression or even domestic intrusion has become an accepted reality. Peace and liberty are forgotten values. To mention war crimes or even express discomfort over such things, is abnormal. Not even radical. It has become anti-social to even care about the victims of imperial government.

The US military has admitted to more war crimes. Now what? Who will do anything about it? Those who made the decisions, the killers who pulled the triggers, will they face justice or will it be another case of praise and raises. Promotions and celebrations. More dead babies, prove the weapons work. After all, it’s their babies. And, so long as they continue to suffer, and die. Those who survive may want revenge and will fight on. Thus, ensuring the forever wars go on. That’s the exceptional attitude.

They, them being those in the frontiers beyond Western civility and the accepted comforts of modern life, are seen as barbarians or savages. They are an existential threat. The public understands this, surely this must be a rationalisation. To kill them over there, murder a child in the crib, is an assurance that they will not kill a Westerner in the streets of a civilised city. The understanding of blowback and repercussions or what makes a terrorist, an insurgent never seemingly understood. The savagery of the savage is always understood. While the mass starvation and mass murdering from the civilised is an understood necessity. It’s not merely collateral, it has become a constant. To kill innocent people for no real reasons, is simply foreign policy.

The current US bombing campaign, Operation Rough Riider, as named by Secretary for War, Pete Hegseth, is a response to the Yemeni Houthi’s blockading and attacking Israeli-linked shipping. The Yemeni blockade of Israel is in response to Israel violating the January 2025 Gaza ceasefire. It is an act of defiance against the genocide against the Palestinians.

Many will look at the civilian death count and shrug, it’s a small number compared to… we have become so accustom to constant wars and the death toll mostly inflicted on foreign strangers that the numbers are blurs. Each nation, and the lists of their dead a forgotten back drop, Those numbers reflect real human beings. The tears and pain experienced by those who survived, are very real. The irony is that while preformative empathy and a mental health fixation has become a profitable trend inside Western nations, their seems to be a lack of empathy for the victims of their government.

They die.

The wars go on.

They die.

War crimes no longer need to be hidden. The Wikileaks revelations fifteen years ago would have no impact now. Who remembers those victims or whatever it was about. The execution of an aid worker, blown to pieces as he transported water for desperate people in Kabul, the punctuation of the US retreat from Afghanistan. The murder of Iranian school girls, or even the shooting down of a civil airliner full of Iranian civilians, four decades ago. The destruction of the MSF hospital, or a little place called My Lai. The massacre at Wounded Knee ended the Wild Wild West and the American-Indian wars. Another war crime. Just a name to be known by any who care, and unknown by those who don’t. War crimes without justice. Just war and it’s bloody inevitability.

What does it say when war crimes can be hung out to dry, in plain sight, innocent blood splashing in the sun. Too few care. And, if they do. What can they do? The mob, loves their government and their government loves war.

So, the wars go on.

And so too, will the war crimes.