10 YEAR ANNIVERSARY
Independent. Anti-War. Unbought.

Blog

The Good Cop – a short story

Raul had been a police man for most of his life, since the age of nineteen. He was now fifty-six. His first arrest was a thief, an old man who had stolen a neighbours cow. He had since thrown trade unionist into prison, had beaten starving wives as they begged for bread while their husbands picketed. France in the 1930s changed government as regular as the seasons, with it laws came and went. Raul and his fellow police men obeyed them all. He was not political, even if all laws were. When the socialists were in, he enforced for them, the nationalists, for them, and so on.

Then came the war, Raul would round up young men to be thrown into uniform. Many of them killed or wounded, mishandled by geriatric minds still fighting the last war. Others surrendered in droves to a fast moving enemy, they fought brave, though ran short of supplies. Police men like Raul made sure that the bodies filled the uniforms and any that did not ended in shackles.

Paris fell. Raul remained a police man. The German’s needed the police to administer their new laws, and once a Vichy government was formed, they would also need an apparatus. Especially the police. Raul found himself rounding up those who rejected the Vichy and German occupations. Partisan terrorists. Or, the resistance. Raul arrested anyone with anarchist pamphlets, as he would under each government past and future, he had handcuffed them for the crime of their thinking. Raul insisted he was not political, only a man of the law.

One evening Raul and his fellow officers broke down a door, inside were illegal persons by race or faith. Jews, they were to be taken in and the German authorities would determine, how Jewish they were and thus what their fates would be. According to the laws. Raul was aware most would endure labour camps, many would die. The Roma, or Gypsies, homosexuals, libertarians, dissenters and anyone with a dangerous outlook all were to be handcuffed, processed and handed over the German authorities, or to be punished accordingly by the Vichy government, per their laws.

Raul participated in anti-partisan raids, hunting down the resistance. Terrorists. Their families and any who had collaborated were to be captured, questioned, tortured and even executed. Raul had shot a fourteen year old partisan boy, and broke both of his brothers legs during one such skirmish. The law did not tolerate law-breakers. Raul slept well at night. The law was the law.

He soon learned about the growing rumours of death camps. It was an open secret, perhaps lies spreading discontent about the Germans and their allies. As far as Raul was concerned, if the legal authority had determined such a thing was legal, then so be it. It was for him to serve the law as a police man and not to question it. He was not a law maker, only an enforcer. On and on, Raul would insist, openly and internally.

On one dreary morning, small girl wept inside of Raul’ arms while he carried her to the back of a lorry. There her parents sat silently. He pushed the child onto the wooden seat, she stared at him, and asked him, why he was doing this.

“It’s my job,” he smiled as he handed her a small doll. He patted her gently on the leg, before the lorry departed.

It was his job. He did it well.

As a matter of fact, Raul had never read the law, not any version of it. He was only told what to enforce by his superiors, who in turn had not read the law themselves but were required to administer the abstract notions of the laws, according to the political will of the government. Which ever government was in power, at that time.

The war was not going well for Germany. The allies invaded, and the French re-took Paris. As far as Raul was concerned, the French were already in Paris and a legal government had been ruling it, alongside the Germans. Once the ‘Free French’ took over, Raul and his fellow policemen were required to enforce the new laws and serve the next legal authority.

He sipped coffee one afternoon as young women begged and pleaded, while their hair was cut from their heads. Shaved and bald heads as punishment to reveal them as collaborators. Raul did not agree with the disorder of the mob, he and the other policemen had been told to allow it to occur. A prostitute he had frequented clenched her fists and spat before a soldiers rifle butt smashed her mouth. Her name was Clarissa. She had been a poet. The crowd cheered. She had been sleeping with the Germans, and men like Raul. Now, he kept the crowd in place, while the new legal authority and it’s supporters exacted revenge.

Clarissa glared with defiance while her face was held tight, the scissors hacking her hair from scalp. Raul had recalled a conversation with her late one night, the pair shared a cigarette on the soiled sheets of a hotel bed.

“Do you have any morals?” she sucked the smoke into her lungs.

“My morality is the law.”

“That is no morality, it’s cowardice.”

Raul now watched the mob spit and hiss at Clarissa. The blonde hair which he had run his fingers through, spilled across the road in broken strands. Clarissa looked through the crowd and saw him, their eyes locked, she whispered, “no morals, just cowardice.”

Later that evening, Clarissa and the other women would be taken by soldiers, as retribution. Raul had declined the offer to join in.

After the war, Raul and his fellow police men rounded up fascists and any one who was a Nazi. He helped collect material that was about the Hitlerian sciences, to be burned. And, soon after he would do the same for anything communist related. Or, libertarian and anarchist orientated. Occasionally he would participate in raids on those selling and ingesting narcotics, he reported one of his fellow officers for opium use. The police man claimed that he was racked with guilt for what he had done during the war years. He should not feel guilt, he had been following orders, enforcing the law.

Raul had arrested men for singing The Internationale, others for pushing out the fascist salute, thrown people into cells for painting the tricolour of France on a wall, and others for burning that very same flag. The law changes. The job of a police man does not.

He had done his job.

One evening as he climbed the stairs to his apartment, Raul was greeted by a young woman, he nodded to her with the polite courtesy of a gentleman and police officer.

“You do not remember me?” she asked.

“I regret that I do not,” he replied.

“I was a little girl when you sent my family and I to a death camp.”

Raul thought back, and drew a blank. He had rounded up countless families for the authorities.

She went on, “my parents died. I barely survived. I want you to have this doll, I don’t know why. But, you handing it to me before we were deported was the last kind thing a man in uniform ever did for me, I suspect you were not even being kind.”

“I was just doing my job,” he answered with sobering clarity as he took the doll.

“I know you were. And that’s all you will ever have,” she walked away, leaving Raul with a stained doll.

Raul unlocked his door, placed the doll on his table. He looked at it, around him an empty apartment, minimal items, the only photos were of him in uniform. Graduation, his first posting, on a push bike, near the Belgian frontier, with German soldiers, with American soldiers, in each photograph his uniform had barely changed, nor had his expression. Only his rank and the masters he served.

He fondled the doll, the fabric bitter, coarse in spots, soft elsewhere. It was real. A tangible thing, not a black and white memory. The doll had been soaked from the tears of a little girl who had now grown into a woman, she had spent her last tear. As he held the doll, Raul wept. The doll was real. The little girl was real. The law was real because he made it so.

In his decades of service, countless lives had been ruined because it was his job to do so. The law, was the law. Right or wrong, it existed and men like Raul would kill and break bones for it.

Raul retired a few years later. A generous pension. Albums filled with photographed memories, invitations to reunions. Whether he had a family or not, would not have changed his story. He was a good cop.

The Kyle Anzalone Show guest Dave Benner: Will Americans Vote Against Israel on Tuesday?

War isn’t distant when it’s priced into every gallon of gas. Dave Benner from Liberty Vault joins us for a blunt end-of-week rundown on the war in Iran, the midterm backlash building around it, and why the administration’s promise that it won’t become a forever war is landing with a thud for a lot of voters.

We react to Vice President JD Vance’s messaging and ask the uncomfortable question: if the public doesn’t “vote on foreign policy,” why do the consequences of intervention keep showing up as inflation, debt, and diesel prices that wreck working people’s budgets? We talk about how a war economy gets financed, how the Federal Reserve and deficit spending can mask costs until they hit household expenses, and why broken “no new wars” pledges are now colliding with election-day reality.

From there we dig into the argument everyone keeps trying to shut down: the US relationship with Israel, donor influence, and the way mainstream commentators frame criticism as obsession or extremism. We also cover Senator Chris Murphy’s warning about an “insane” war plan, the alarming optics of military mass grave training, and the new “Fortress America” preparedness rhetoric that raises questions about escalation abroad and pressure at home.

If you’re trying to make sense of US foreign policy, the Israel lobby debate, the War Powers gray zone, and what all of it means for the midterms, this is the clearest path through the noise. Subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review with the biggest question you want us to tackle next.

The Kyle Anzalone Show: Does Netanyahu Need to Reignite the Iran War to Stay in Power?

Starlink sounds like a simple story about connectivity, until you ask one question: who gets to decide when a “civilian” network becomes a weapon? We start by digging into Elon Musk’s statement on Ukraine, where he draws a hard boundary around Starlink and offensive drone strikes, and we explain why SpaceX points to Starshield as the proper channel for military use. From cost incentives to security blowback, we lay out why this fight is not just technical, it’s strategic.

Then we shift to Israel’s election aftermath and the growing pressure cooker around Iran. We walk through coalition math in the Knesset, why Arab turnout matters, and how a threat of escalation can become political leverage. If a unity government suddenly sounds “necessary,” what problem is it really trying to solve, and who benefits from the timing?

We close with the bigger US Iran war story: the dangerous assumption in Washington that America decides when conflict ends. Using Trump’s remarks and the sanctions push touted as “Operation Economic Outcast,” we challenge the idea that a short bombing campaign or currency collapse will break Iran’s will. We talk retaliation dynamics, regional fronts, and a Reuters investigation into Iran’s procurement networks that keep drones and missiles moving despite the blockade.

If you want clearer context on Starlink vs Starshield, Netanyahu’s incentives, and why sanctions can backfire, hit subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What part of this story do you think most people are missing?

The Kyle Anzalone Show guest hosts Producer Chris & LtCOL. Karen Kwiatkowski: Could Voting Independent Change Washington Politics?

They’ve spent years telling you an independent vote is a wasted vote. We don’t buy it, and we walk through why the “safe” choice keeps delivering the same disappointment, the same hypocrisy, and the same top-down control. Karen Kotowski sits in for Kyle and talks with producer Chris Leonard about what independent voting actually looks like when you’re not trying to fit your life into a red-team or blue-team identity.

We use Matthew McConaughey’s viral case for independent thinking as a jumping-off point, then get specific about power. In a narrowly divided Congress, three to five truly independent members could become the deciding votes, forcing real debate before war, slowing the Uniparty steamroll, and making leadership negotiate in the open. We also dig into why “principle” still matters by looking at figures like Ron Paul and Thomas Massie, and why issues like the Epstein files expose how quickly both parties close ranks when accountability threatens dark money, blackmail, and the permanent political class.

Then we zoom out to the structural problem: ballot access and rigged incentives. Joe Manchin’s warning about predetermined seats, low-turnout primaries, and the hoops independents must jump through raises the question of whether the United States is still operating like a representative republic or sliding deeper into empire, with a deep state and a military-industrial complex that elections can’t easily touch. A sharp clip from Robert Barnes adds one more twist, predicting a multi-party future that could break the two-party system from both left and right.

The Kyle Anzalone Show guest Kelley Vlahos: Does Trump Know the American People Are Done

A citywide Russia Ukraine ceasefire tied to a Melania Trump backchannel sounds absurd on its face, which is exactly why it’s worth taking seriously. We walk through what’s actually being reported, why a humanitarian corridor can still count as a diplomatic breakthrough, and how even “small” agreements test whether Moscow and Kyiv can coordinate anything at all after years of grinding war.

From there, we get into the story that won’t die: did Ukraine lose access to Starlink, Starshield, or neither, and who made the call? We talk about why the distinction matters, how satellite connectivity shapes drone warfare and escalation, and what the conflicting statements reveal about an unsteady US posture. If Washington wants leverage, clarity matters. If Washington is flailing, allies pay the price.

We also dig into the Iran track, including the argument that the memorandum of understanding functioned more like a delay tactic than a real path to peace. We connect that to energy markets, tanker attacks, the Strait of Hormuz, alternative shipping corridors, and the uncomfortable reality that “take the oil” is a slogan, not a strategy. The big question we keep coming back to is simple: if diplomacy loses credibility and oil pressure rises, does the US reach for another round of strikes even though air power can’t bomb a political problem into submission?

We close with the domestic politics angle, including Trump’s “jihadist” smear against a Michigan Senate candidate and what fear based messaging says about the midterm environment. If you care about realist foreign policy, antiwar analysis, and how elections shape war decisions, hit subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review so more people can find the show.

The Kyle Anzalone Show guest Ken Silva: Thomas Crooks, Jan. 6 Pipe Bombs & OKC

An inch is not a “near miss” in politics, it’s a different timeline. Ken Silva joins me to lay out what we actually know about the Butler, Pennsylvania Trump rally shooting, what still makes no sense, and why the FBI’s slow drip of records feels more like narrative management than transparency. We talk about the death of rallygoer James Copenhaver, the frustrating reality of 75,000 pages sitting behind a monthly trickle, and the simplest unanswered questions that matter most: how security failed, what warnings were missed, and why key decisions like return fire timing still lack clear public explanations.

From there, we widen the lens to the geopolitics of assassination claims. You’ve heard the talking point that Iran was trying to kill Trump, but the evidence stays elusive while the political impact is huge. We break down how intelligence claims can be shaped by foreign sources, how “plots” can be manufactured through informants and sting operations, and why that matters when those stories get used to justify escalation and war.

We also dig into the January 6 pipe bomber case, including the arrest of Brian Cole Jr., the defense argument that a confession was coerced, and the fight over surveillance video and raw files that could confirm or contradict alibis. Finally, we cover one of the most extreme entrapment stories we’ve seen: the “Pineapple Front” case, where a supposed New York Stock Exchange bombing plot ends in acquittal and raises hard questions about FBI undercover tactics and incentives. If you care about accountability, FOIA-driven reporting, and separating real threats from built-for-headlines cases, subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with your biggest open question.

The Kyle Anzalone Show guest Karen Kwiatkowski: Why Did JD Vance Refuse to Endorse Netanyahu?

A president under pressure almost always looks for a villain, and today we’re asking a sharp question: is Zelensky becoming the White House’s favorite scapegoat? We react to Zelensky’s on-camera response, then pull the thread on how blame travels during a long proxy war, especially when diesel prices rise, approval drops, and the Iran war keeps dominating headlines.

We also get into the nuts and bolts that rarely make the talking points. Patriot missile deliveries stall, partners wait on approvals, and even Starlink becomes part of the leverage game. When PAC-3 interceptors are backlogged for years and the US defense industry is stretched across Ukraine, Europe, Taiwan, and Japan, “support” stops being a slogan and turns into a triage problem. That’s where strategy, capacity, and politics collide.

From there, the conversation widens to Israel, Netanyahu’s election incentives, and the fear that escalation with Iran can be sold as a “win” while reshaping election timing and public opinion. We also break down JD Vance refusing to endorse Netanyahu, what that might mean for 2028 positioning, and why so many Americans feel unrepresented enough to stay home on Election Day.

If you’re trying to understand US foreign policy, the military-industrial complex, Ukraine aid, and the midterm elections through one clear lens, this is the deep dive. Subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review with your take: scapegoating, strategy shift, or both?

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest