Blog

The Kyle Anzalone Show with Daniel McAdams: Axios Says US–Iran Deal Reached as U.S. and IRAN Trade Missile Fire

Congress is hollowing out, and the consequences show up first in foreign policy. Dan McAdams returns to talk with us about what Thomas Massie’s primary loss signals for antiwar oversight, why the Ron Paul era of forcing floor debates through appropriations fights is largely gone, and how that vacuum makes it easier for Washington to slide into the next conflict without friction.

We dig into Iran and the so-called ceasefire: the strikes, the responses, and the familiar pattern of narrative manipulation where the U.S. can provoke, then rebrand escalation as “defense.” We also unpack the latest claims of a draft Trump Iran deal, why leak-driven reporting deserves extra skepticism, and how media pipelines can function like message distribution for competing interests rather than real journalism.

From there we move to Israel and Gaza, including Netanyahu’s comments that point toward annexation, the U.S. role in funding and arming the campaign, and the way Lebanon and Hezbollah complicate any regional settlement. We also discuss harrowing firsthand accounts of Gaza’s blockade and a political paradox: anti-intervention voices are breaking through culturally, but votes and power haven’t caught up yet. Finally, we zoom out to Latin America, from Javier Milei and BRICS anxiety to U.S. drug war strikes in Guatemala and the danger of normalizing kill-first policy without due process.

Trump Continues to Test Limits of Iran Ceasefire, How Will Tehran Respond?

A ceasefire is supposed to lower the temperature, not provide new vocabulary for the same war. We unpack reports that the U.S. bombed targets in Iran after a ceasefire and why calling it “self-defense” can still function as a direct escalation. I walk through what those strikes signal, how each side tries to define the rules midstream, and why Iran may tolerate only so many “limited” hits before choosing a bigger response.

From there, we get specific about the hard constraints behind the headlines: weapons stockpiles, interceptor burn rates, and how long it can take to replace key munitions. That context changes everything about threats, deterrence, and the realism of returning to a high-intensity U.S. Iran war. We also break down Marco Rubio’s public talking points on Iran’s nuclear program, what U.S. intelligence and international monitoring have said, and the reported outlines of a possible memorandum of understanding that touches sanctions relief, frozen assets, and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump’s White House remarks add another layer, including talk about Hormuz control and a shocking shot at Oman, one of the most important mediators in U.S. Iran diplomacy. We connect that to the bigger regional picture, including Israel, Lebanon, and the Washington voices pushing to keep the fight going. Finally, we pivot to Jill Biden saying she feared Joe Biden was “having a stroke” during the 2024 debate and what that raises about cognitive decline, transparency, and the massive war powers concentrated in the presidency.

The Kyle Anzalone Show Trump Has Allowed Netanyahu to Control Negotiations, and it’s hurting Americans

Memorial Day brings out a lot of scripted lines, but we want to talk about the part that gets avoided: what American wars actually cost, who pays, and how often the public is left holding the bill while elites chase ideology, influence, and profit. We start by looking at the human consequences for service members and veterans, and why so many deployments overseas end with the same problems still on the table, just with more graves and more resentment.

Then we shift into the biggest moving story right now: Iran negotiations, the Iran nuclear program, and why the phrase “on the brink of a deal” can be more propaganda than reality. We break down uranium enrichment in plain language, what the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty allows, and why demanding “zero enrichment” is not a technical detail but a deal-killer. We also explain how Lebanon and Hezbollah change the endgame, why escalations in southern Lebanon can function as sabotage, and how the Strait of Hormuz becomes real leverage that reshapes every calculation.

We also react to Trump’s messaging, including his push to fold Iran into the Abraham Accords, what those normalization deals have meant in practice, and how they can drive an arms race while adding impossible complexity to already fragile diplomacy. Along the way, we play and respond to clips featuring Cory Booker, plus a debate moment where Mearsheimer and Walt confront Pompeo and Nuland’s talking points, and we close with a quick look at Thomas Massie signaling a possible national run.

Obsession (2025) a review of sorts, or maybe just my thoughts…

Obsession (2025) a review of sorts, or maybe just my thoughts…

It was refreshing to walk into a full cinema for a film that was not attached to a video game or some 20th century property suffering through needless cannibalism. Alas, Blumhouse has managed to produce another hit with a small budget, slim cast of relative unknowns and a plot that revolved around theme and characters. I did not enjoy this movie, but that does not mean I do not recommend it.

Obsession, is being touted as a horror. I think it could pass for this, but it fits more into the psychological thriller category with extremes of gore. It is a slow burn, with needless exposition. For example, we will see things happen and then the next five minutes revolves around the characters explaining what had occurred. While this is not a verse, chorus, structure that modern double screening cinema is required to do for present audiences, ie those distracted by scrolling or who have the film on in the background while they game, cook or re-arrange their jars of stewed peaches. I feel in the case of Obsession, the writer wanted to reiterate elements that were occurring.

Spoilers ahead.

This movie is in some ways a layered litmus test. In the era of mental health to the point of identity obsession. This film reveals a strange disconnect for many who really don’t understand the deeper terrors for those enduring true trauma or who are prisoners against their will.

I suppose we need to address the plot and characters. Swear words follow.

Bear, is the protagonist. He is an insufferable cunt. Every sentence he speaks sounds like fingers drawing down a chalkboard and what words he spews tend to revolve around his own self interests. His cat dies early in the film, he is living in his grandmothers home who had also recently passed. Somehow, the feline managed to find her medication and in true Chekhov gun fashion, the pills killed the cat. And rest assured, there will be a real Chekhov gun to follow. Bear is upset that the cat is dead. Clearly he has emotions. We see him cry. So, the writers want us to know that he is not without emotions.

Bear also likes a girl, a member of his friend group, Nikki. She and two of his other friends went to school together and now work in a music shop. Ian and Sarah are the other two friends. The shop is owned by Sarah’s dad, who it seems generously hires her three friends. We know Bear likes Nikki because in the opening of the film, he is rehearsing what he will say to her while a waitress pretends to be her and Ian watches on. It’s sort of a lazy scene but gives us an idea of how, Bear feels about Nikki.

Bear is awkward and clumsy to the point of obnoxiousness. Nikki considers him as a sibling, perhaps her slightly dimwitted friend who she is protective over. Nothing about his character development suggests any charm, he is barely attentive and fixates on his wants, and while others talk to him, he seems to struggle with hearing them. But, he is infatuated with Nikki. And for some, this apparently is…sweet? Romantic?

Nikki we are shown is compassionate, this is framed with her empathy for a homeless person. She has ambition, she wants to be a writer and is filled with hopes and desires. She tells Bear about her intentions to leave their town and find something more, love, or passion that may help her with the book she is working on. She is trapped and wants to be free. Instead of being happy and supportive of his friend. Bear is frightened. This is a ticking clock for our narcissistic person, he wants her to stay and he now has a limited time frame to tell her his feelings.

During a conversation on the phone, Nikki mentions that she has lost her crystal necklace. Bear soon finds himself in an alternative lifestyle shop, the type to sell crystals and other metaphysical paraphernalia. In Blumhouse style, there is humour and with some Millennial writing imbued to remind us not to take things too seriously, and to even laugh at times, we have such dialogue. Bear finds a wishing willow, he blathers and molests the shop clerk with the sounds that come from his mouth. Later on, he drives Nikki home from work and the insufferable protagonist ends up meandering and mumbling, sputtering and losing and missing and fucking up for several minutes with Nikki. So, once she leaves him to stew inside of his car, he breaks the wishing willow and casts his evil, “I wish Nikki Freeman loved me more than anyone in the entire world.”

Freeman. Nice work with that one writers.

Nikki is then standing on the porch, and this is where the independent, intelligent human being that she was, turns into a doll for audiences to squirm and point at her as though she is a freak. To see her actions, her presence, her expressions and so on as creepy, or freaky as she was apparently called in school. Freaky Nikki. A name she mentions not liking.

Nikki who was once a creative and vibrant human being, filled with energy and ambition. Hopes and dreams. Becomes a possession to Bear. His wish traps her and tortures her spirit and mind. She must love him. She has no choice and while the film’s title and trailer frames it that Bear is somehow a victim to her obsession, she being a villain or monster and he simple the innocent from his own tragic misstep. Perhaps, we should view it in the reverse.

It was his obsession with her. His infatuation and entitlement which deranged into a whimsical wish that now transformed her from a human being, into his kept doll. Over the days of their ‘relationship’, she barely leaves his side. We can see that it pains her when she is not with him. In one scene, when he leaves the house for most of the day for work, she remains standing with a frozen smile. Soiling herself, urinating and vomiting as she remains locked in place, waiting for his return.

I told you not to be weird,” our uncaring cunt says. Her pain and indignity barely registering to his embarrassed need. She apologises and promises to clean up the mess, as she showers. What pride she once had, washes down the drain. While our selfish ‘hero’ stands outside moaning some dialogue to her.

During the night, as she sleeps when the real Nikki whispers and struggles, we have the East Asian depiction of ghost imagery, a slender dark figure of a girl standing, featureless and watching. It’s a trope in the West now, since The Ring. Nikki performs this for the audience. Because, to be creepy and weird is now horror. She stands there to watch him sleep, and moves awkwardly. Again, for the audience so we have those boxes ticked. But, alas, why would she be doing this, if not in turmoil and twisted inside a misery.

In another night time scene, Bear rapes his victim as she lays with a frozen smile, a tear on her cheek. For the rapist sympathisers in the audience, it’s his privilege to take her body while her mind remains imprisoned. He thrusts and takes his possession, once he has finished, thankfully for her, a minute at most, she says what needs to be said to placate her kidnapper. In earlier scenes we have moments where the real Nikki breaks free, screaming, scared. Again, token jump scares, or, a revelation as to who the actual monster in this film is.

Other weird things occur, moments of discomfort. Including while at a party, Nikki reciting prose expressing her peril. The drunk, stoned and illiterate friends roll their eyes or watch aghast. Bear, watches on, he is embarrassed. Then, as drama arises she smashes her face with a glass bottle cutting herself severely. Bear lays back watching. Poor me, the piece of shit thinks while the woman imprisoned by his wish self harms, and mutilates herself. For some reason he argues with someone at the hospital and takes her home. Never tending to her wounds. The piece of shit has shown he has the ability to use search engines, and seek information as to how one may apply first aid. Instead, she remains in pain and with cuts on her face. Poor Bear, doesn’t care. Her disfigurement encapsulates the ruination of her being.

Other things occur which continues to reveal how vile Bear is as a human being. And, the anguish of Nikki. At one point while she is asleep, she is talking to him as her true self, pleading with him. She wants it to end. Bear makes it about him and leaves his victim to suffer. No doubt after he had raped her again.

Sarah, the other friend likes Bear. No idea why. She shares a scene with him where she is hopeful that she will get accepted into university. Another character unlike Bear who has ambition. While his victim is at home in bed, he is sharing in an intimacy with Sarah and she reveals her feelings for him and he has a realisation that attraction and even love is something that should be consensual.

Then Nikki strikes, we need that jump scare, though was it? She bashes Sarah’s head into the steering wheel. Comically graphic, and putrid as a character we had come to know, is reduced to a pulped corpse. Nikki tells Bear he has to help her hide the body, he does so. Then, he goes to his friend Ian’s house and explains what we have seen. To return back home to Nikki. Who has stripped Sarah naked, is wearing her clothes and has inked her skin and pierced herself so that she may look like the corpse in the hopes of being like Sarah was, and thus more attractive for Bear. Unfortunately, Sarah is laid bare her corpse naked, exposed and a further indignity.

A pistol that was mentioned earlier in the film, finds itself now in Nikki’s possession who shoots Ian the moment he walks through the door. Bear does what he should have done even before he made the wish and attempts to shoot himself. Again, he lacks any courage. So, he swallows the pills that killed his cat. Thankfully he dies. Hopefully painfully. Nikki, is now free of his curse.

What she ‘wakes’ to is sudden horror. Pain, her friends are dead and there is no way any investigators will believe her story. She is now likely to be imprisoned as a murderer or so traumatised that she becomes a prisoner of her experiences and memory. The end.

I did not want to review the movie and write out everything that happened, only to highlight some points. There were moments where people laughed at scenes when Nikki was doing something ‘weird’, I would like to put this down to that awkward release that occurs at time. Then, again, I feel some may see this as a movie where Bear is the victim. The obsession with unrequited love fills music and fiction to the point of accepted entitlement. Stalking and obsessive behaviour can be framed as romantic, depending on the perspective. If the love is not returned, such behaviour is eerie and unwelcome.

The tragedy of the movie, is not in the wisher getting what he wanted, and it turning out to be more complicated and terrible than he had hoped. It’s in the coercion of another, who is not viewed as a human being with self agency but simply as a thing to own and have. In 365 Days, our abuser kidnaps the woman he is infatuated with. Telling her that she has a year to fall in love with him. It only takes a few days because he is ‘hot’ but above all else rich. Tall dark, handsome, badboy (he is a child trafficker and drug dealer, but he owns a million dollar plus yacht, so hot.) The woman he kidnaps falls in love with him, naturally. She is an insert for the intended audience.

His wealth and lifestyle seduces her. Even if he kidnaps her and takes away her agency to begin with. This is nothing like that. Nikki has no choice. The very actions and motions her character makes during the movie are moments of degradation and the destruction of the human spirit. Because it’s a low budget horror movie, made to entertain and even give the audience some giggles, it’s also a mirror to how people view others. How they really think about trauma and abuse. We live in an age where mental health is a monetised commodity and used as a grandiose act of self interest, but sincerity tends to be lacking when it’s a very real thing. Because many victims hide in plain sight and, sometimes they may do things that appear ‘creepy’ or ‘weird’.

Nikki is the victim. Bear, is the monster. I recommend this movie in the same way that I do, The Housemaid, which may be advertised as a sexy film because, again our abuser is rich and hot. It shows a type of abuse and control that is often inflicted in plain sight. Power, wealth and the institutional ‘importance’ of the abuser tends to allow for it to continue on. While that is a film which is more than it at first seems, it is both entertaining, a little convenient at points, especially at the end but should leave one with lingering thoughts.

Obsession, was for me initially boring, then twisted into a layered character story concealed in schlock horror. I am glad I saw it. I felt a disdain and desire to rip Bear’s throat from his skull and empathy for Nikki. While in the latest Guy Ritchie action, I forget it’s name now. I felt nothing. In the Minecraft film, all I felt was my seat moving from the kicking feet of excited males-boys at every reference to a video game I have never played. I felt something from this movie and that is what cinema should be about, it’s not meant to be just entertainment or bubble gum chewing. It should invite us to think or experience discomfort. Go see it, or don’t. I hope movies like this give the audience an obsession for story telling again.

The Kyle Anzalone Show: Trump Has Lost in Iran, What Will He Do Next?

Trump says he wants “few people killed,” then talks like bombing Iran is a weekly calendar event. That contradiction is where we start, because the public narrative around the Iran war keeps snapping from all-out threats to last-minute “negotiations” as deadlines magically extend. I walk through why that cycle looks less like strategy and more like a president boxed in by bad options, public messaging, and allies with their own priorities.

From there, we get into the part most outlets blur: the difference between political victory laps and what US intelligence and reporting suggest on the ground. If Iran can rebuild its drone program faster than expected and still holds a large share of missile and launcher capacity, then “we crippled them” becomes a dangerous story to believe. We also talk about what Iran likely learned from recent strikes and why modern drone warfare and air defense evolve at a pace that makes simple claims obsolete.

Then we widen the lens to the power side of the equation: can Trump actually control Netanyahu, or is Washington being pulled by Israeli pressure through Congress? I connect that to a Washington Post-reported defense strategy that burns through American interceptor stockpiles, and to the Thomas Massie primary loss, where massive spending and media targeting mattered more than most people want to admit.

If you want clear Iran war analysis, Strait of Hormuz leverage, uranium enrichment stakes, and the US politics that shape it all, hit play. Subscribe, share the show, and leave a review, what’s the one detail you think the mainstream story keeps avoiding?

The Kyle Anzalone Show with Prof. Joe Terwilliger on Getting “Loomered” and the Potential for a Deal with North Korea

A professor makes a $500 campaign donation and suddenly gets cast as the “most important man in America” pulling congressional strings. That absurd story is the perfect doorway into what we really care about here: how narratives get manufactured, why propaganda works, and what it’s doing to both domestic politics and foreign policy.

We start with science diplomacy and cultural diplomacy, the old-school idea that researchers, students, artists, and athletes can keep human ties alive even when governments can’t stand each other. Joe explains how that cooperative model is being redefined across the West into something closer to state leverage, where technology sharing and academic exchange are treated as tools to punish rivals. We connect that to a broader post-truth media environment, where sound bites beat evidence, repetition beats nuance, and voters can be segmented by where they get their news.

Then we move to North Korea and try to replace slogans with incentives. We talk Kim Jong-un’s regime survival logic, the strategic reasons nuclear deterrence persists, and why US policy whiplash makes long-term deals hard to trust. We also dig into North Korea’s tightening relationship with Russia, China’s concern about influence and instability on its border, and how sanctions can push sanctioned states into deeper trade and technology cooperation. Finally, we touch on rare earth minerals and why they could matter in the next phase of Korean Peninsula geopolitics.

If you want a clearer framework for understanding science diplomacy, misinformation, and North Korea strategy, listen through and share it with someone who only sees headlines. Subscribe, leave a review, and tell us what you think credible peace and credible reporting should look like.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest