Blog

Palestine/Israel Erupts Again

In Coming to Palestine I defended, from a libertarian perspective, the Palestinians against Israeli/Zionist oppression. I am reluctant to repeat that case in a far shorter form here, but the horrendous current events throughout Palestine/Israel, including the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, cry out for comment. I can do no better than to link to Caitlin Johnstone’s piece “Fifteen Thoughts on Palestine.” It deserves careful reading.

I will add only a few thoughts. The mainstream criticism of the Palestinians, who object to being dominated by a settler colonial state, boils down to “But Hamas….” (This is not to say, of course, that all would be well if Hamas disappeared.) My answer to that objection is this: how long will take to learn that relentless oppression of a group breeds and nourishes the most violent (“extremist”) faction of that group? If you want the violence-minded constituents not to rise to the top or to fade away, you must stop oppressing the group! Don’t make violence appear to be the only alternative because all peaceful paths have been blocked.

Yet that is what Israelis and their bipartisan American-backers have consistently done for decades with their phony “peace process” and other subterfuge.

I don’t like Hamas. Even though it has moderated its aims and has given signs of accepting of two-state solution, it’s a far cry from having a libertarian orientation. For one thing, launching even its crude rockets toward civilians is wrong, however understandable. I attach that final phrase because many residents of the Gaza Strip are refugees from earlier expulsions perpetrated by pre-state Zionist paramilitary forces and then the Israeli military. One of the places where refugees were driven from is Sderot, which is a rocket target favored by Hamas. Still, I condemn targeting civilians.

That said, we must never forget who the aggrieved party is: the Palestinians, who were driven from land they had lived on and worked for generations–all for the sake of building a Jewish state. Let’s also remember that at one time much Jewish opposition was expressed against the idea of a Jewish state in part because it would require mistreatment of the Palestinians. (Again, see my book.)

Finally, ceasefire talk is in the air, both from Hamas and the UN (and opposed by the Biden administration). Yet Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Lior Haiat says, “We don’t think this is the right time for a ceasefire.”

That’s the worst thing a government spokesman or leader can say when that government is pulverizing essentially defense people. Keep in mind that under “normal” conditions the people of Gaza are treated worse than prison inmates, subjected to bad water, restricted food and medical supplies, and complete control over entry and exit by the Israeli military.

It’s always time for a ceasefire, followed by real good-faith efforts to relieve the Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere of the oppression they have suffered for so many years.

We’re Here to Help

After a fiery year of cultural outrage against the state of policing in America, President Joe Biden’s administration has announced that they have heard the pleas of the people. They will not stand by while a nefarious force maliciously targets the African American community. America needs to ban menthol cigarettes.

Beyond the glaringly obvious problem of increasing the amount of dangerous police interactions, prohibition itself has a century long record of documented failure. Alcohol prohibition was short lived, the war on drugs has long been lost, and firearm involved violence is heaviest in areas with the strictest gun control. Many civil rights activists have pointed out how drug and weapons laws negatively affect people in minority and low income neighborhoods. One unfortunate consequence is the proliferation of black markets coupled with a general lack of opportunity that increases the amount of organized crime/gang activity and acquisitive crime in these areas. This leads to victimless crime enforcement turning into crime enforcement of those with victims.

The FDA briefing on the subject was spurred by a court deadline to address a 2013 citizen’s petition and has backing by some civil rights groups who claim that flavored tobacco creates a health disparity among racial groups, mirrored in a comment by acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock. She believes that the ban “will help save lives, particularly among those disproportionately affected by these deadly products.”

Critics of the ban are quick to point out the hypocrisy and short sightedness of the policy. Progressives claim that systemic racism plagues the justice system and argue “my body my choice” in conversations surrounding issues ranging from drug use, prostitution, and abortion. The ban outright ignores the presupposed right to choose. Even worse, it is criminally targeting the exact population its defenders claim to be helping.

Historically, many seemingly well intentioned government programs and legislation provide the opposite of the desired results. Increased taxes on tobacco in New York, implemented as a discouragement for the purchase and use of the products, created the environment that found Eric Garner choked to death for his alleged unlicensed sales of loose cigarettes. This new ban, proposed in the name of keeping Americans safer and healthier, will have the same tragic and distorted outcome.

Zach Kincaid is a songwriter and blue collar worker from Northern California.

Beware Political Creationists

“With few exceptions, the tribe of academic scientists and hospital doctors which now controls our government has literally never heard such arguments [the unplanned order of thee market process]. Their worldview is a top-down one: they assume things happen because somebody ordains that things happen. Spontaneous order is a foreign concept to them. This is surprising, given that it is the essence of evolution, but when it comes to society they are in thrall to intelligent-design theories. They are political creationists.”

–Matt Ridley, “Britain Is in Danger of Repeating Its Post-War Mistakes”

Eli Clifton Exposes WaPo Op-Ed Writer’s Defense Industry Ties

Washington Post – The propaganda arm for the Defense industry quietly let’s us know who is behind the opposition to Biden’s Afghanistan troop withdrawal. Of course she is a professor at Harvard.

“Last week, the Washington Post ran an op-ed opposing President Joe Biden’s commitment to withdraw U.S. military forces from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021, by Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass and Meghan O’Sullivan, “professor at the Harvard Kennedy School, and the North American chair of the Trilateral Commission,” according to the Post. That bio, as originally published on Friday, omitted a crucial, and highly lucrative, position held by O’Sullivan: board member at Raytheon Corp, one of the top five arms makers in the world.

Raytheon, which has a $145 million contract to train Afghan Air Force pilots, is a major supplier of weapons to the U.S. military. In other words, weapons of war is Raytheon’s business and the end of America’s longest war almost certainly poses a threat to the company’s bottom-line.

O’Sullivan and the Post failed to note her role in the weapons business for which she was paid $940,000 in cash and stock between 2017 and 2019.”

2021 04 22 06 39

 

WaPo quietly acknowledges op-ed author’s defense industry ties

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest